• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    When the last two Popes have been more progressive than trending world leaders, theres a problem.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        The catholics fully supported the fascist movements in Italy, as they do now. As they will continue to do.

        It looks like the current Pope is following the previous Pope’s line of standing against them, and calling them out.

        We’re being spoilt by the last two popes.

      • rickdg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Unfortunately, we’re not gonna get rid of religion anytime soon. Best case scenario is for the christians to follow what Christ said.

      • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Let go of the hate, my friend. It does you no good to carry that weight.

        I’ve got some religious people you should meet, who fly pride flags and preach inclusivity, affirmation, and love. They like to talk about how Jesus welcomed sinners and told the proud holier-than-thou hypocrite-types they could fuck right off.

        Don’t paint with black and white. There’s a whole spectrum out there in this beautiful world.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bloody fucking useless piece of gilded trash, just like the rest of them.

    (Unless you need to cover up the rape of a child, of course.)

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    During Sunday mass in St Peter’s Square, the pope asked that God ‘open borders, break down walls [and] dispel hatred’

    Borders do serve a purpose, though. Should Ukraine open their borders to Russians? There are legitimate reasons for wanting to keep other people out.

    • tartarin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think you didn’t get what he said because you have no clue what nationalistic political movements are. It’s not about borders. You can have and enforce borders and still be inclusive.

      The Pope is entirely true on this. We are replaying the early last century mistakes if we don’t care about it.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, the quote I was responding to used the words “open borders” specifically. I may not understand the meaning of the term, as it is being used here, but hopefully you can understand my confusion. I didn’t realize that “open borders” meant “you can have and enforce borders.” I proceeded on the assumption that those two states exist in opposition to one another.

        • shplane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t know for sure but I suspect he means “open borders” in the context of welcoming/helping refugees and not treating immigrants with such xenophobia

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Should Ukraine open their borders to Russians?

      If they’ll accept Ukrainian law and, you know, not attempt to take over the country, yes why not? Open borders don’t contradict self-defense.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        If they’ll accept Ukrainian law and, you know, not attempt to take over the country, yes why not?

        And if the Russians don’t accept those terms? Or, say that they accept them to gain entry only to then carry out a campaign of slow annexation?

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Then they’re dealt with in the same way anyone else would be if they tried to do that; I’m not sure what your point is. Border “security” against individual crossing and national defense against an enemy state are two completely different things.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That is a valid point…if you think refugees are an organized army attacking you…are they?