• compostgoblin@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Just for the sake of clarity, there is a difference between jumping above 2C during a year and the long-term average being above 2C, which is what we’re usually talking about when it comes to global warming. This headline, and the 1.5C headlines from 2023, tend to muddy the waters. Shit is bad and getting worse, but it’s not quite as bad as you might think at first glance.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Living in a boring country weather-wise, I am not looking forward to ecological, political etc effects of climate change…but it was our best May on record.

  • artifex@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    As stupid as this sounds I think we (and really the media, but we know which side they’re on) should be doing this in F for US audiences. Saying “hey, it’s now 5°F hotter than it was in the 1970s” is more immediately meaningful — and the bigger number looks scarier too.

  • scytale@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The heat index in my city right now as a type this comment is 42C/107F. And summer is just starting. This is gonna suck.

  • danzania@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m curious about the scientific consensus continually undershooting. At a certain point, if you’re always updating in one direction, shouldn’t you overcorrect a bit?

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      the scientists made their models taking human behavior into account, but they’ve mistakenly modeled hunan behavior off of rational, informed individuals

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The could also spend a lot of money on transitioning to green energy too. But it’s cheaper to spend on people manipulation. Everything is fine, it’s always been this way!