noerdman@discuss.tchncs.de to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 1 年前Four Eyes Principlediscuss.tchncs.deexternal-linkmessage-square104linkfedilinkarrow-up1680arrow-down122file-text
arrow-up1658arrow-down1external-linkFour Eyes Principlediscuss.tchncs.denoerdman@discuss.tchncs.de to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square104linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前if you get enough data of a specific enough task I’m fairly confident you can get something that is relatively unbiased. Almost no company wants to risk it though because the training would require that no human decisions are made.
minus-squareNalivai@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 年前The problems in thinking that your data is unbiased, is that you don’t know where your data is biased, and you stopped looking
if you get enough data of a specific enough task I’m fairly confident you can get something that is relatively unbiased. Almost no company wants to risk it though because the training would require that no human decisions are made.
The problems in thinking that your data is unbiased, is that you don’t know where your data is biased, and you stopped looking