Consider these headlines from recent days:
“France and Switzerland shut down nuclear power plants amid scorching heatwave,” was the July 3rd headline on Euronews. As the piece explained: “To cool down, nuclear power plants pump water from local rivers or the sea, which they then release back into water bodies at a high temperature. However, Europe’s ongoing heatwave means that the water pumped by nuclear sites is already very hot, impacting the ability of nuclear plants to use it to cool down. On top of this, nuclear sites run the risk of posing a dangerous threat to local biodiversity, by releasing water which is too hot into rivers and seas.”
edit: it seems like there’s gonna be a very negative response to this article so to respond to all of them in advance. If I were you I would question why this article supporting non extractive means of green energy over extractive forms of green energy offending your sensibilities so much.
The problem is phasing out fossil fuel, and now. Nuclear power plant take so long to plan and build that using them as solution to the climate emergency is only a way to prolong the use of fossil fuels. We no longer have the luxury of time.
Several of your assumptions here, I think, are highly suspect. But regardless of that, even by your own logic, putting out hit pieces on existing nuclear plants is counterproductive.
I didn’t post the article. I just replied to your comment.
Edit: Just realized, am I vaguely accused of something undefined?