• Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    14 days ago

    How would the barrier of entry be lowered? Are you suggesting new investors are going to buy properties they can’t turn a profit on?

    Why do you think it would work like that?

    • Gravitywell@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Why wouldn’t they be able to make a profit? The demand for housing wouldnt be any lower, they just can’t increase rent above what it was.

      The barrier of entry would be lowered by greedier land lords deciding to sell rather than not being able to raise rent, so people who are slightly less greedy and willing to make only maybe a 300% profit instead of a 1000% profit would take over. Corporate landlords get flushed out to make room for smaller mom & pop owners.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      If the existing investors have to sell at a loss because there’s no profit to be made, someone gets to buy them for cheaper, making it profitable again.

          • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            Until those properties slowly disappear from the rental market as they’re bought by owner occupiers.

            Which is a problem if you can’t afford to buy a property.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 days ago

              So the entire city will only be owner-occupiers? Sounds like almost everyone living in the city has their problems solved. The city can build more rent-controlled units.