Unwrap means it forces to evaluate the result as an ”ok value”. If it’s an ”error value”, it will crash. It’s a bad practice to rely on it, as it’s one of the most common ways a Rust programs can crash.
Rust offers many options to handle errors that don’t risk crashing. For example, unwrap_or_default, which means ”if it’s an error value, use the default value for this type, such as 0 for integers”
A very typical use-case would be getting something from a HashMap (or a Vector) and calling unwrap because you know it must exist (as you got a reference to the index or object that must be valid in the HashMap or Vector).
Or if you call a function that returns Option<…> depending on the current state and you know that it must return Some(…) in the current situation.
Unwrap means it forces to evaluate the result as an ”ok value”. If it’s an ”error value”, it will crash. It’s a bad practice to rely on it, as it’s one of the most common ways a Rust programs can crash.
Rust offers many options to handle errors that don’t risk crashing. For example, unwrap_or_default, which means ”if it’s an error value, use the default value for this type, such as 0 for integers”
I mean using unwrap is not bad practice if the value is guaranteed to not be none, which can happen frequently in some applications.
A good example would be regex. After validating it when writing the program it should always compile, although this could also be solved with a proc macro that validates the regex at compile time.
If it’s guaranteed to not be
None, why is it anOption?A very typical use-case would be getting something from a HashMap (or a Vector) and calling unwrap because you know it must exist (as you got a reference to the index or object that must be valid in the HashMap or Vector).
Or if you call a function that returns
Option<…>depending on the current state and you know that it must returnSome(…)in the current situation.Unwrap is good for prototyping and trying out stuff fast, but it generally shouldn’t make it past a code review onto main, unless you’re very sure
Exactly.
Personally, I call it “python mode” since you’re staying on the “happy path” and let the program just crash out if those expectations aren’t met.
Thanks.