“Newspaper which uses AI to write its articles concocts derogatory term for people who doesn’t use AI”

Im also a gun vegan, a car vegan, a facebook vegan, an exercise vegan (unfortunately), a windows vegan, … just not actual vegan.

I feel like thats a bad way to use the word vegan.

This makes about as much sense as calling Linux users “Windows vegans”.

Choosing to not use AI isn’t some wacky contrarian position, it’s a tame position that can easily be justified. (Don’t want to use AI? Then don’t.) If anything, trying to assert that constantly using AI for everything would be the new normal is the wacky position.

The better term would be “LLM gobbling fuckheads” for those who use that stuff and believe it has anything to do with “AI”

Journalists constantly trying to be the origin of a term.

I refuse to use it because it’s shit.

We are not the same.

“refuse” lol as if there were a general requirement to use this shit

Missed opportunity to coin the term “Aitheist” Fools.

I hate the term AI vegan. I prefer mistechnitinoimosyne. More classy.

There has to be a catchier name than AI vegans…

how to belittle and minimize a very serious thing: call any protesters of it a " ___ vegan"

We don’t need to invent new terms, like ‘AI Vegan’, when we have a perfectly good term already: Butlerian Jihadist.

People who use the term “vegan” for somebody they consider extremist, ascetic, or annoying are really telling on themselves.

Side note: one of the most genius rebrands of all time was the way fake leather (which is often made from polyurethane, a type of plastic) suddenly became aspirational “vegan leather”.

Most vegan leathers are made from compostable materials, because (surprise, surprise!) many vegans are also environmentalists.

I am a AI Freedom Fighter.

ha so I’m a double vegan