cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/46045941

“We need a reality check. Otherwise we are heading at full speed against a wall,” Mercedes chief executive Ola Kaellenius told the Handelsblatt business daily of the 2035 goal, adding that Europe’s car market could “collapse” if it goes ahead.

  • shane@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Banning sales of fossil fuel cars after 2035 is exactly the plan.

    • Localhorst86@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      No. Banning sales of non-zero emission plans is the plan, it doesn’t specifically ban combustion engines. Combustion engine tech has stagnated like the last 4 decades, though, so it’s highly unlikely they’ll be zero emission within 10 years.

      This is car manufacturers complaining that they haven’t made steps forward for 40 years and are now forced to switch to the technology that made them obsolete.

      • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Combustion engine tech has stagnated like the last 4 decades,

        This isn’t true at all, combustion engines have improved by huge amounts in terms of efficiency and reliability in that time.

        • Localhorst86@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Reliability? Absolutely.

          And on paper, they made significant steps to reduce emissions in their engines. But that’s on paper, the VW scandal a few years ago has shown us how trustworthy those figures are.

          Efficiency? Not really. Combustion engines used in cars still only average to about 30% effiency, which is a number only marginally higher than what I learned in school over 20 years ago. This is largely because car engines mostly dont operate within their peak-performance/efficiency windows.