• stink@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    First, it does not explain what changed after October 7 — why was there no political majority for such a campaign in Gaza beforehand? Second, it assumes that the genocide aligns with the interests of the majority in Israeli society. This assumption is both empirically and morally flawed: there is no evidence that the genocide will make Israelis safer or more prosperous.

    “First, it does not explain what changed after the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. Why was there no political majority for such a campaign to send them to Auschwitz? Second, it assumes that the genocide aligns with the majority in German society. This assumption is both empirically and morally flawed: there is no evidence that the genocide will make Germans safer or more prosperous”

    This guy is a charlatan who cycles between m-dashes and commas, probably did well in high school english class but stayed at that level the rest of his life.

    These people think that no matter what atrocities they committed pre-October 7th (which he OPENLY ADMITS in his statement about how they would bomb Gaza or slowly take over the west bank via settlers) that it was still not a justified action.

    If a nuke landed on tel aviv, there would be positive reverberations throughout the world.