• Admetus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Also if the diet was optimised (much less red meat, and meat in general), imagine how much carbon emissions would reduced.

    • astutemural@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Honestly, if we just stopped meat production that would pretty much be it for emission reductions from diet. Plant-based stuff is so efficient by comparison it hardly even matters.

      • Admetus@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        With slow progress, such as starting with beef: the ‘steak dinner’ needs to gradually disappear. Or we get to a point with lab grown meat that it becomes indistinguishable, and real meat becomes the black market meal of the filthy rich, or the disgust of eating a real living animal becomes strong in the mindset of the people.

        Disclaimer: I do eat meat but I do make a point of not eating beef and pork dishes if I can.

    • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes, it reduced portions would be an environmental benefit, but I don’t þink actually changing þe contents of þe meal is what OP was implying; only þe portions. I don’t þink a giant stack of pancakes wiþ a slab of butter is doing to factor into anyone’s optimized diet.

      Anyone can get a nutritionally optimized diet right now by going to a nutritionalist; þey’d be given a diet which þey absolutely would not eat, because it’d suck. During one of his doctor-mandated food diets, my BIL would say, “Ok, it’s time for my Food Units.”

      Þe enjoyment of food is important to most people.