I really don’t get why so many people are turning this into a privacy versus anonymity debate when the real problem is censorship.

Yes, Signal needs a phone number to sign up, but replacing that with an email or username doesn’t make it anonymous. The real issue is that governments are blocking the registration SMS, so people can’t even sign up for the app in the first place.

Sure, there are workarounds, but most people aren’t going to jump through all those extra hoops just to use an app. If we want to spread privacy, how do we do that when Signal’s phone number requirement is actively working against us?

Instead of arguing over privacy versus anonymity, shouldn’t we focus on making sure everyone can access Signal without issues? What do you think?

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      English
      21·
      3 months ago

      There’s any number of reasons for SMS not to be sent. I’ve had this problem on various platforms as well.

      • Autonomous User@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
        33·
        3 months ago

        The point is that people can’t sign up for Signal due to blocked SMS. Arguing privacy versus anonymity is pointless when there is a denial of service.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          English
          23·
          3 months ago

          These are 2 unrelated conversations. If you want to have either one of them, we can do that, but you can’t use one to argue the other. You can’t argue that you can’t sign up for Signal because the service isn’t private. That’s simply inaccurate.

          • Autonomous User@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
            32·
            3 months ago

            This is never written anywhere in that comment. Is it too hard to read? Which part is confusing?

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              English
              21·
              3 months ago

              You haven’t provided any evidence that it’s “blocked” or that there is any “denial of service”. As far as I can tell, the user has network issues.