[Caution, leftist infighting/snide remarks below]

spoiler

I’m confused, doesn’t worsening material conditions count as political utility in his eyes?

Edit:I normally wouldn’t have an issue, since it’s actually pretty sane, but I literally thought to myself today “it would be funny if BE said Kirk’s death was a bad thing because adventurism will make things worse.” I was joking. I’m starting to hypothosize that economists [both accelerationist and reformists] are actually simps for the status quo

  • 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It’s funny because the dudes a hardcore accelerationist when he talks about the west burning but then when things accelerate and he isn’t the one making all the comments he gets stuck up his own ass about it. At this point his ideology isn’t communism, it’s his own ego. He HAS to be contrarian to let us all know how dumb we are and how smart he is.

    • Sleepless One@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      At this point his ideology isn’t communism, it’s his own ego.

      He more or less confirmed that explicitly.