cm0002@piefed.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agoBeware, another "wonderful" conservative instance to "free us" has appeared media.piefed.worldexternal-linkmessage-square595fedilinkarrow-up1762arrow-down175
arrow-up1687arrow-down1external-linkBeware, another "wonderful" conservative instance to "free us" has appeared media.piefed.worldcm0002@piefed.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square595fedilink
minus-squarepinball_wizard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 days ago Can’t we apply the same logic with leftists? It is imperative (to someone) that we do. Otherwise folks might wise up and get angry at billionaires.
minus-squareFlax@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·7 days agoSo if a pro-palestine rally has a jihadist, then they’re all jihadists?
minus-squarepinball_wizard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 days agoThe important thing is that we fight each-other, instead of requiring billionaires to play by any rules.
minus-squareubergeek@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·7 days agoIf they don’t eject the jihadist, then yes. And, frankly, I don’t know many, if any, leftists who would tolerate a jihadist, as they are just a different type of religious fundamentalist right winger.
It is imperative (to someone) that we do. Otherwise folks might wise up and get angry at billionaires.
So if a pro-palestine rally has a jihadist, then they’re all jihadists?
The important thing is that we fight each-other, instead of requiring billionaires to play by any rules.
lmao true
If they don’t eject the jihadist, then yes. And, frankly, I don’t know many, if any, leftists who would tolerate a jihadist, as they are just a different type of religious fundamentalist right winger.