• DivineDev@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 个月前

    I used to be like that, nowadays I just choose a distro that comes with a DE I like out of the box, switch to dark mode, set a wallpaper and call it a day.

    • ColdWater@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 个月前

      rookie number i know but I don’t wanna waste anymore time than I already did, gotta spend those time for DE/WM hopping :P

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 天前

      Not worth it and you will spend all your time on fighting the system instead of using it.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 天前

    XFCE + Compiz was 100% worth the effort of doing it once and then being able to just copy to a new device.

    Waiting for XFCE to complete their Wayland transition, and I’m gonna upgrade to Wayfire.

    That being said, yeah I give KDE to basically everyone else new to Linux lol

    • danielton1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 天前

      I agree that KDE is better for newcomers. I’ll never understand why the newbie-friendly distros tend to favor GNOME.

      • TeddE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 天前

        It’s a lowest common denominator kinda issue, methinks. Gnome is chasing it’s own tail trying to create a single UI that will please everyone, plus have it simple to use and both similar enough yet distinct enough to/from Windows/Mac experiences. It’s a noble enough goal - but honestly strikes me as well impossible.

        KDE gives you a barely updated Win95 era desktop and then becomes a tinkerer’s paradise - whenever there was two or more options, they focused on making each available, but neither becomes the default.