Why is nobody commenting on the phone battery?
No mom, I’m gonna BE a girl for Christmas. puts on programming socks
That’s 100% how I read it at first.
Who needs a girl when you have monads to keep you warm?
Or become a girl with gonads
Jokes on her, I’ve transitioned since last Christmas.
I am the girl! Hmm, but maybe I’ll bring another one too? 🤔
The more the merrier!
it’s yuletide! everyone (except that person. they know what they did) is welcome and celebrated!
Not sorry
when you burst into the wedding promising doom and death, we didn’t kick you out because we didn’t believe you, we kicked you out because we already knew. i mean, i’m involved let’s be real.
You can still bring a girl though
Mission failed successfully: I’m bringing my enby instead and you can’t stop me.
If your mum is not OK with this, can I be your adoptive parent?
You gotta admit though, Haskell is crazy good for parsing and marshaling data
Yes. I’m divided into “hum… 100 lines is larger than I expected” and “what did he mean ‘from scratch’? did he write the parser combinators? if so, 100 lines is crazy small!”
But I’m settling in believing 80 of those lines are verbose type declarations.
You could probably write a very basic parser combinator library, enough to parse JSON, in 100 lines of Haskell
Judging by the Parser newtype, he did.
I decided to write it myself for fun. I decided that “From Scratch” means:
- No parser libraries (parsec/happy/etc)
- No using
readfrom Prelude - No hacky meta-parsing
Here is what I came up with (using my favourite parsing method: parser combinators):
import Control.Monad ((>=>), replicateM) import Control.Applicative (Alternative (..), asum, optional) import Data.Maybe (fromMaybe) import Data.Functor (($>)) import Data.List (singleton) import Data.Map (Map, fromList) import Data.Bifunctor (first, second) import Data.Char (toLower, chr) newtype Parser i o = Parser { parse :: i -> Maybe (i, o) } deriving (Functor) instance Applicative (Parser i) where pure a = Parser $ \i -> Just (i, a) a <*> b = Parser $ parse a >=> \(i, f) -> second f <$> parse b i instance Alternative (Parser i) where empty = Parser $ const Nothing a <|> b = Parser $ \i -> parse a i <|> parse b i instance Monad (Parser i) where a >>= f = Parser $ parse a >=> \(i, b) -> parse (f b) i instance Semigroup o => Semigroup (Parser i o) where a <> b = (<>) <$> a <*> b instance Monoid o => Monoid (Parser i o) where mempty = pure mempty type SParser = Parser String charIf :: (a -> Bool) -> Parser [a] a charIf cond = Parser $ \i -> case i of (x:xs) | cond x -> Just (xs, x) _ -> Nothing char :: Eq a => a -> Parser [a] a char c = charIf (== c) one :: Parser i a -> Parser i [a] one = fmap singleton str :: Eq a => [a] -> Parser [a] [a] str = mapM char sepBy :: Parser i a -> Parser i b -> Parser i [a] sepBy a b = (one a <> many (b *> a)) <|> mempty data Decimal = Decimal { mantissa :: Integer, exponent :: Int } deriving Show data JSON = Object (Map String JSON) | Array [JSON] | Bool Bool | Number Decimal | String String | Null deriving Show whitespace :: SParser String whitespace = many $ asum $ map char [' ', '\t', '\r', '\n'] digit :: Int -> SParser Int digit base = asum $ take base [asum [char c, char (toLower c)] $> n | (c, n) <- zip (['0'..'9'] <> ['A'..'Z']) [0..]] collectDigits :: Int -> [Int] -> Integer collectDigits base = foldl (\acc x -> acc * fromIntegral base + fromIntegral x) 0 unsignedInteger :: SParser Integer unsignedInteger = collectDigits 10 <$> some (digit 10) integer :: SParser Integer integer = asum [char '-' $> (-1), char '+' $> 1, str "" $> 1] >>= \sign -> (sign *) <$> unsignedInteger -- This is the ceil of the log10 and also very inefficient log10 :: Integer -> Int log10 n | n < 1 = 0 | otherwise = 1 + log10 (n `div` 10) jsonNumber :: SParser Decimal jsonNumber = do whole <- integer fraction <- fromMaybe 0 <$> optional (str "." *> unsignedInteger) e <- fromIntegral . fromMaybe 0 <$> optional ((str "E" <|> str "e") *> integer) pure $ Decimal (whole * 10^log10 fraction + signum whole * fraction) (e - log10 fraction) escapeChar :: SParser Char escapeChar = char '\\' *> asum [ str "'" $> '\'', str "\"" $> '"', str "\\" $> '\\', str "n" $> '\n', str "r" $> '\r', str "t" $> '\t', str "b" $> '\b', str "f" $> '\f', str "u" *> (chr . fromIntegral . collectDigits 16 <$> replicateM 4 (digit 16)) ] jsonString :: SParser String jsonString = char '"' *> many (asum [charIf (\c -> c /= '"' && c /= '\\'), escapeChar]) <* char '"' jsonObjectPair :: SParser (String, JSON) jsonObjectPair = (,) <$> (whitespace *> jsonString <* whitespace <* char ':') <*> json json :: SParser JSON json = whitespace *> asum [ Object <$> fromList <$> (char '{' *> jsonObjectPair `sepBy` char ',' <* char '}'), Array <$> (char '[' *> json `sepBy` char ',' <* char ']'), Bool <$> asum [str "true" $> True, str "false" $> False], Number <$> jsonNumber, String <$> jsonString, Null <$ str "null" ] <* whitespace main :: IO () main = interact $ show . parse jsonThis parses numbers as my own weird
Decimaltype, in order to preserve all information (converting toDoubleis lossy). I didn’t bother implementing any methods on theDecimal, because there are other libraries that do that and we’re just writing a parser.It’s also slow as hell but hey, that’s naive implementations for you!
It ended up being 113 lines. I think I could reduce it a bit more if I was willing to sacrifice readability and/or just inline things instead of implementing stdlib typeclasses.
So, ARE you bringing a girl?
I’m not coming to my parents for this new year’s because I might get arrested and/or sent to die in a war. But once Putin dies, yes, I am
So that’s two things to look forward to!
Didn’t know where you were talking about til you said Putin.
serde has entered the chat
From Scratch (as much as I like Rust, it’s very likely more verbose from scratch). Haskell is perfect for these kinds of things.
I will concede that implementing the first version in Haskell would be better.
Mostly so that we can then fulfil the meme of reimplementing it in Rust!
I’m a girl. I’m not interested in Haskell, that’s too frigging endofunctiorific. Erlang! That’s what all the cool guys are doing.
This kind of text hits differently when you’re a lesbian.
Wouldn’t it hit the same as it would a straight male?
POV: Not all moms are accepting of their daughters being into girls.
I don’t think “programmer” fully captures the reality of being an emacs-based programmer.
A JSON parser in Haskell, what a day to have eyes
?
Haskell’s incredibly good for writing parsers.
But oh boy is it difficult. We started with Haskell in the first semester CS and it was a pain. Kudos to anyone seriously developing in Haskell.
Eh, it’s just different. Other languages are hard in other ways. Haskell’s at least have very good reason behind them.
I write Haskell professionally and and am teaching to people without any experience, and it’s really no different than anything else. Though I will say that my experience is that university professors are often pretty clueless about the language and don’t teach it well.
I think it’s the paradigm change. Most people including myself learnt some kind of procedural language in school, shifting towards functional thinking is just very difficult. But of course that’s a skill a computer scientist must have and one of the reasons I didn’t graduate.
I wouldn’t trust a guy letting their battery go that low either
NOTE: no proper error reporting
Add those few lines, will ya?
But that would break the 111 line rule.
There’s a rule?
Not anymore.
There are far more male programmers… As a programmer, be gay or stay alone… Choose!
Oh that explains why my wife is gay
If she was around the same cs students as me then yeah
She sleeps with men, that’s pretty gay
There are a lot of things she does but that aint one of them
Think you forgot to check their username before commenting that haha
It’s odd in the Australian public service, with COBOL programmers. They’ve been in the job long enough that they started when the public service was the only employer who would employ women as programmers. I’m on the systems analyst side of the fence, the programmers I have worked with include a bit more than 60% women
I think all the programmers I know are married or gay or not interested. I think the gay ones are mostly married too.
Can programmers only be with other programmers or am I missing something?
Well yeah, obv. But not enough girls in computer science, so like the fishes, some of them magically turn into girls after a while.
“JSON parser 100% from scratch in Haskell in 110 lines” doesn’t get you horny? I guess some people are just wired differently.
I’m a programmer myself but my wife isn’t a programmer, that was my motivation for questioning.
Oh, is she, like, an EE or something? Maybe a web designer?
There are those who transition, so a significant chunk of that male programmer population is “male” as in quotation marks, only that some transition earlier than others. Does not guarantee that you can get the transgender autistic puppygirl (or other variations) of your dreams, since many of them are lesbians.
But also feel free to look outside your field for a partner. It’s okay to date an artist as a programmer.
Feels weird reading this as the only single woman programmer in my friend group who likes men
I think programmer should be seen as a gender itself.
I’m currently transitioning myself, already have a homeserver and a Linux PC, can’t wait to be a real programmer.
and gender confirmation would not be getting called sir/ma’am at the starbucks but people asking you for IT help?
I detransitioned from being a programmer and all I have is depression since, maybe I should retransission into being a programmer
Prisoner of war?
Paucity of waifu
not sure if it’s sarcastic: point of view










