As of this week, half of the states in the U.S. are under restrictive age verification laws that require adults to hand over their biometric and personal identification to access legal porn.

Missouri became the 25th state to enact its own age verification law on Sunday. As it’s done in multiple other states, Pornhub and its network of sister sites—some of the largest adult content platforms in the world—pulled service in Missouri, replacing their homepages with a video of performer Cherie DeVille speaking about the privacy risks and chilling effects of age verification.

Archive: http://archive.today/uZB13

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This is going to expand. The next wave is going to be keeping kids off of social media. That means they will have to be age-verified, which they can’t do, because they’re kids, and don’t have ID. Instead, everyone else will have to be age-verified in order to use the Internet.

    Here in Florida, I’ve already heard one state lawmaker scoffing at any objections, saying it’s the same way we keep kids from buying alcohol - by checking EVERYONE’S ID. Now they’re going to do it for the Internet. Every movement and post you make on the Internet will be directly tied to your verified identity. That should be perfectly fine, as long as you aren’t doing or saying anything wrong, right?

    • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      it’s the same way we keep kids from buying alcohol - by checking EVERYONE’S ID

      Tell him there’s a big different between checking an ID and making copies of one

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        What? You mean explain NUANCE to a MAGA? Their entire political pallette is Black and White, and you want to introduce colors?

    • paperazzi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      By “wrong,” you mean anything against the political party that intends to stay in power permanently, correct?

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Worse, it means anything they want it to mean, at whatever moment they need it. You could be perfectly fine today, and tomorrow be public enemy #1.

        Look at the Venezuelans. I have several very close Venezuelan friends, all of whom came to America to escape the brutal Maduro regime. They all arrived illegally, but very quickly hooked up with lawyers, and got documented ASAP, which all previous non-MAGA Administrations were happy to assist with. All eventually became American citizens, and got jobs, some started their own businesses, and they have been active, positive contributors to American society. Even Conservatives were happy about it, because it gave Maduro a black eye.

        But today, all Venezuelans are evil gang-members, here to rob, rape, pillage, and eat our pets. Not because they are all those things, but because MAGA simply says they are, and today, these good people are all considered demonized criminals, by the same people who used to be proud of them for resisting Maduro.

        You can be the best American today, and be the worst American tomorrow, if MAGA decides that it is politically expedient.

    • bbwolf1111@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      My niece is given a iPad from the school with Roblox installed on it. Along with whatever programs they preinstalled for school. I don’t think there is any plan to get kids off of social media at all! It’s about getting data on everyone else, not actually “the kids”.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Here in Florida, the ENTIRE argument is about passing a law that keeps kids off all Social Media. To do that requires age-verification, but since kids don’t have a way to do that, they will age-verify EVERYONE, and kids won’t be able to get past that.

        And like everything they do, it’s a fool-proof system that the MAGAs have designed. Surely no kid will ever learn their parents password, or borrow their Dad’s ID for the verification process, etc. If I were a kid, I wouldn’t sneak my Dad’s wallet in the middle of the night, and take a photo of the front and back of his Drivers Licence for future reference. No kid will ever figure that out, right?

        Of course they will. So we’re going to surrender our anonymity on the Internet, just so we can implement an extremely flawed system that won’t work, but that’s OK, because keeping kids off the Internet was never the objective, tracking every single person using the Internet is the real objective.

        And people will surrender that basic right, “for the kids.”

    • Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m fine with that. Kids will adapt like we did and make their own space. Or a single company will capture them all like tiktok and the gov will shit themselves again.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Wow, COMPLETELY miss the point, why don’t you? It’s not about the kids, you moron, they’re using the kids as an excuse to oppress the rest of us.

        And your reaction - Ah, the kids will be fine - is exactly what they’re hoping for. You will permanently surrender the privacy of every person on the Internet, just because some parents don’t feel like doing their jobs as parents.