It doesn’t take that much energy and power to run an LLM or an image generator, and sure, it would take a lot with so many users connecting, across so many servers… but there’s just no way they’re not mining bitcoin. My math might not be mathing but it seems like AI doesn’t justify the power use and it seems like everybody’s lying.

Someone who knows more about this inform me of your opinions

  • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bitcoin mining doesn’t normally use GPUs. They use dedicated ASICs. Far more effective, and cheaper in every way.

    In addition, AI is in the “growth at any cost” phase. There is a TON of investor money to burn, with little need to show future profitability.

    • umbrellacloud@leminal.spaceOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      If that’s the case, why don’t they pull the Renaissance artist scam and just take a bunch of money and swear they’re working on stuff? If they don’t have to prove anything, why use any energy at all?

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Little need, but not no need. They need to have a vague path, and something to show for it.

        • umbrellacloud@leminal.spaceOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          A vague path and something to show for it means using a bunch of energy for something they’re not even really doing…?