• atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    Of course only men will be forced to defend the country. Their lives are worth less than women and the Swiss even agreed recently (voted against expanding the draft to women).

    • Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      From a purely reproductive POV, keeping women alive is more important than keeping men’s because their reprooductive functions can be supplied by sperm banks.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Tech not needed. I’m 54. None of the women I’ve had sex with in the past few years, at my age, are capable of bearing children. My parts still work. You only need one man per 1,000 women to keep the population going.

        (I pulled that out of my ass with no concern for inbreeding, but you get my drift.)

        Evolution tells us women are more important, even past child-bearing age. Why do women live longer, even when they can’t possibly conceive? Why would we need grandmothers? Been some great science on that take!