Welcome again to everybody. Make yourselves at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is the weekly discussion thread.
☭ Matrix homeserver and space
☭ Theory discussion group on /c/theory@lemmygrad.ml
☭ Find theory on ProleWiki, marxists.org, Anna’s Archive


Nor Victoria 3 nor even Civ 6 Tokugawa
Why specifically Tokugawa?
Glad you asked! I should preface all this by saying you can’t really like “learn” any real socialist theory from Civ 6 but what I mean is that Tokugawa is probably the best civ in the game for beelining for the Communist government type and a Scientific or Cultural victory.
Bakuhan inflicts penalties on international trade whilst making domestic trade routes (which usually yield Food and Production but not much else) generate Culture, Science, and Gold equal to how many Districts are at the source (in addition to Food and Production). It also makes all your cities within 6 tiles of the capital permanently loyal and therefore immune to being conquered period.
Meiji Restoration makes Japan’s district adjacency bonuses way better as well which allows you to carefully build very tightly and efficiently where other civs would feel boxed in.
In Civ 6, Communism as a form of government focuses on production and defensive strength; adopting it automatically gives land units an extra +4 defensive strength, and makes your cities +15% more productive. Policy cards unlocked by the Class Struggle civic include Collectivization which makes domestic trade routes yield way more food, Defense of the Motherland which makes modern units cost 100% less production and reduces War Weariness, and Five Year Plan which makes Industrial Zone and Campus adjacency bonuses even MORE powerful.
So when you put it all together, Tokugawa is overwhelmingly the best pick for if you want to play a communist style game. He wants you to create a dense, tall civ that focuses on land management and production that can easily resist aggressive, imperialist civs. It’s kind of funny how he has little to do with socialism historically but turned out to be such an outright communist civ lol. If you’re going into a new game wanting to take full advantage of the Communist government type, he’s probably who you want to choose.
Thanks for reply, i have few good plays in Civ 6 but i never played Japan before, i mostly play either some ancient civ like Sumer or modded Lenin
It’s mostly like i like to play anyway
Well, it is at least better than in previous games. You see, i have a theory that Sid Meier do know at least that much of a historical materialism to know that any civilisation is based on production and the science/trade/military are just results of that. But only in Civ 6, never before, we get something resembling production focus route. And of course it means that communism is gonna be OP, as it should be.
Lol. On a side note, i still can’t get over Civ VII shooting its foot by copying civ change on epoch - worst feature of Humankind which is by itself rather crap game.
Yeah I’d highly recommend Tokugawa or Ba Trieu next time you play for an anti-imperialist experience, along with Sukritact’s mods for extra wonders and ocean resources.
I can’t get over it either! Civ 7 was free to play for a week recently (desperate much?) and I had basically the exact same experience the first time I tried it; I played for 3 or so hours and was so confused but also bored stiff that I just stopped playing. People are all like “erm Civ 6 wasn’t playable on release either just give it time 🤓” well I gave it 1.5 years and it’s still fundamentally broken and deeply unsatisfying even if it does have a couple of good ideas like navigable rivers. Civ 6 DID hook me from day 1 even if it took some time to get used to the mountain of new mechanics. I’m a massive Civ fan and it’s heartbreaking that the game is FR unplayable. It’s just so disjointed and like… unsatisfying?? Nothing clicks, at all. And the wonder building animations are SHOCKINGLY shitty compared to 6. What a disaster.
I think 7 will get better after 2 expansions, every Civ game before also did, and they recently made the civ change optional so its at least a step in right direction. Also Civ 6 was actually unplayable at launch because of the crazy barbarian spam which took them some week to fix, but otherwise yeah 6 was better than both 5 and 7.