• Dr Zarkon@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    Maybe the same reason you didn’t mention any of the current humanitarian crises happening in Sudan, Myanmar, The DRC, Yemen, and Xinjiang China?

    • gastroglizzy@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      Don’t forget Taiwan, Tibet, Somalia, Ecuador. Madagascar, Tanzania, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and The Philippines.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Exactly. People always have a bias or interest. Even if, globally speaking, I or you care for the humanity of all people and the victims of all conflicts. Time, space and resources in general are limited. So our bias, attention span, education, etc. Create a background filter for what we dedicate our time and attention.

        This is why the “of course” clause in leftist rethoric always have to apply. Free Palestine, of course has to necessarily mean a care for all human suffering across the globe. It is implied by default. It is just this three seconds are dedicated to this issue in particular.

        When people have objections they usually include them. Like terfs who can’t shut up about how much they hate trans people even when, on the surface, they seem to be using feminist rethoric. Antisemitic assholes will always include a qualifier to insult Jewish people. And even reject other areas of pro-palestinian discourse. Because they want to focus on the hate, the positive message is being coopted. Just like feminist messages are coopted to hate on trans women. It becomes obvious that the point is to promote hate, not to support people being oppressed.