• DarkGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Vague. Does that mean, let them keep launching attacks against your civilians from behind human shields, or send in ground forces expecting wildly massive casualties?

    • NotBillMurray@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      At its root it’s actually pretty simple. If it involves killing children, do not do it. If you’d like we can get into the more in depth discussion of slowly forcing more and more people into a terrible situation and how that drives them into the arms of Hamas, but at its root, don’t shoot kids.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Given that one cannot see the future, there’s always a chance of collateral damage with any military action, and a decent chance it will be a child in Gaza where the inhabitants decided to have a lot of them, it sounds like you’ve ruled out any sort of reprisal. Let them slaughter your civilians with impunity, then? Great plan.