• GreenM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    When i read title like this I can’t help but wonder, are those kids going to better off without their income though ? My humble guess is that not every family have parents who can support their kids or have access to social care system that can prevent whole family to scrap by to be able to get by.

    • 20hzservers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think the answer is the parents of those kids need to be able to make a living that can support their children. Yes they might be worse off if they lose that income but that misses the bigger issue that children shouldn’t need to earn an income to help support their families.

      • GreenM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        That is obvious yet it doesn’t happened but i somehow don’t see it would happened by e.g. closing the chocolate factories or something like that.

        • blujan@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          As soon as child labor truly disappears, the workers pool is reduced and workers compensation must go up. Child labor only benefits the companies paying less.

    • 20hzservers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think the answer is the parents of those kids need to be able to make a living that can support their children. Yes they might be worse off if they lose that income but that misses the bigger issue that children shouldn’t need to earn an income to help support their families.