• stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Now we’re cookin, would’ve rather read the science or nature articles over a local news resource any day. It’s so easy to pop up “news sites” and push them as authority figures

    • naturalgasbad@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The article literally says it was published in Science. If it was only 3 sentences, why did you read none of them?

      • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Because none of it loaded for the mobile view on my iPhone, didn’t expect it to be a bug with the website.

        Things didn’t need to get hostile, you had no need calling names and throwing around stereotypes. You took my viewpoint of the article some random person wrote and took it personally.

        I can’t help you with your anger dude, I’m sorry.

        In fact, prior to reading the offending comment, I was pretty open to your comment citing the science and nature articles.

        Over an article about corn enrichment.

        • naturalgasbad@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          “why the fuck was this posted”

          “it’s a shit article”

          ah yes, I’m the one being hostile

          Nevermind that the reference to Science is literally in the first sentences loaded in the mobile view.