Tankies have shit views all over, including that Saddam’s Iraq was ‘stable’ rather than ‘oppressive’. Nothing about the illegal invasion of Iraq. But you have fun jerking off to gassed Kurds.
First, you said it was not oppressive, but stable, but nice try.
Second, they very much are. Oppression does not create a stable society, it merely bottles up tensions. But I wouldn’t expect a tankie fuck who gets hard over the deaths of minorities to understand that.
But you have fun jerking off to a million dead Iraqis.
Wanna remind me how many Iraqis Saddam’s regime killed?
God, imagine being so intellectually and morally bankrupt that you simp for Saddam’s Iraq. That’s some peak brainrot. I would say tankies never cease to amaze, but honestly, I’m not even a little surprised.
It was a hell of a lot more stable.
Oppressive was the word you were looking for.
No, stable.
“God, I love it when Kurds are genocided, that’s what true stability looks like.” - Least repulsive tankie
Everyday the definition of the word tankie becomes more nebulous; now it includes people who think the invasion of Iraq was a bad thing.
Tankies have shit views all over, including that Saddam’s Iraq was ‘stable’ rather than ‘oppressive’. Nothing about the illegal invasion of Iraq. But you have fun jerking off to gassed Kurds.
Stable and oppressive are not mutually exclusive. But you have fun jerking off to a million dead Iraqis.
First, you said it was not oppressive, but stable, but nice try.
Second, they very much are. Oppression does not create a stable society, it merely bottles up tensions. But I wouldn’t expect a tankie fuck who gets hard over the deaths of minorities to understand that.
Wanna remind me how many Iraqis Saddam’s regime killed?
God, imagine being so intellectually and morally bankrupt that you simp for Saddam’s Iraq. That’s some peak brainrot. I would say tankies never cease to amaze, but honestly, I’m not even a little surprised.
Dictatorships usually are.