Nothing more disappointing to me than seeing a game I might enjoy… and then it’s only available on PC on Epic Games store. Why can’t it be available on Epic, Xbox game store and Steam? It’s so annoying, like you have no choice but to use Epic… which I would literally do ANYTHING not to use.

  • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    An exclusive on Epic Games may as well just not even exist, as far as I’m concerned. Didn’t play Anno 1800 until it was finally released on Steam. Nice discount too.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      So they still got your money eventually. That’s a double win, in their eyes.

      • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        They lose day 1 hype, tho. Sure, the game eventually comes to steam, but that’s after it’s already been overplayed on twitch and YouTube’d to death.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          In what way does that matter outside of driving sales? Which people like op happily still gave them?

            • Ech@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              If that was actually a concern, why would companies do it at all?

              • njm1314@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Why do companies do exclusive launches? Presumably they think the money they get from Epic is more than the money they’ll lose in sales. Whether or not they’re right is another question.

                • Ech@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Presumably they think the money they get from Epic is more than the money they’ll lose in sales

                  Congrats on getting the point.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          In what way is it not? They get Epic’s money for exclusivity and know they’ll still get sales after it ends from people that “boycott” them for doing that.

          Buying the game later doesn’t hurt them, it just reinforces the same behavior later.

      • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Everything but I will focus on the main point of the apps. Selling and managing games.

        Steam store page has tags for what genre the game is and user reviews as well as information about system requirements. Plus links to click on to go to the developers and publishers pages to see what else they’ve made. You get plenty of information while it’s still easy on the eyes and digestible.

        Managing your games with steam is a breeze. They’re listed down the side and the search is there and quick. Click on a game and get more information about it and see a large install or play button. Scroll down to see info about the latest update or activity from friends playing. Right click to get more information like where it’s installed locally.

        Epic, at least when I last used it. Didn’t have user reviews, the page had large widgets for all the information making everything feel clutter while giving you less info about the game. Didn’t have tags and sure it did label the publisher but not the developers and you couldn’t click to see their other works.

        Epic’s library management once again large widgets while giving less information. Feels cluttered. Install button is small. At the time I used epic there was not easy way to open install location. You had to go in file explorer yourself and find it.

        While I’m on the topic of stores to why do console store pages suck as well compared to steam?! The console is literally sold at a loss and make money by selling you games but their store pages are shit compared to steam.

      • Emerica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Pretty much everything really. It’s basically a store and that’s it, no cool features that Steam has. They may have achievements now but not positive. Think it took two years just for them to add a shopping cart. They dump money on developers to release exclusively on Epic instead of spending it making a good experience for customers. No reviews, no forums, no workshop etc.

        I grab the free games they offer every couple weeks and use Heroic to play them, not touching their launcher.

        • shneancy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          not to mention steam’s:

          screenshot manager

          community card trading

          friends & chat

          easy to join small muliplayer (friends can just send you a button that launches the game and joins them instantly)

          highly customisable profiles

          tools & soundtracks

          achievemnts

          and so much more that can be simply small little fun

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Copying my reply to someone else:

        Epic is anti-customer: https://medium.com/@unfoldgames/why-i-turned-down-exclusivity-deal-from-the-epic-store-developer-of-darq-7ee834ed0ac7

        Tldr: Kickstarter Game with a lot of interest while in development announces a release date on Steam. After the date announcement they get contacted by Epic saying “we’d love to host your game” for an exclusivity deal.
        Dev responds that they would be happy to have their game on Epic but promises were made during crowd funding that it would be available on Steam.
        Epic replies that they aren’t interested if it’s not exclusive.

        This tells me that

        1. Epic is full of shit. "We’d love to have your game, but only if it’s exclusive.
        2. Epic doesn’t care about being a better service for its customers. Having the game available on Epic as well is strictly better for Epic’s customers and they easily could have done that. They chose not to.
        3. Epic is not interested in actually having to compete with other companies. This would require them to provide a better service in some fashion. They are only interested if they can force people “if you want to purchase this game you have to buy it through us” which is anti-consumer.
  • drdiddlybadger@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    If a game is only released on Epic, it hasn’t been released yet. Its just in some weird alpha state until it has broader release.

  • Affidavit@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I recently discovered that I can buy, download, and launch games from my Epic Games library without having the Epic Games Bloatware even installed.

    Heroic Games Launcher serves as a storefront, installer, and launcher for Epic Games, GOG, and Amazon.

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I say this every time Epic comes up but it remains the same.

    Steam is the pro-consumer storefront. Epic is the pro-developer storefront. What Epic seems to fail to understand is that by being so staunchly pro-developer, they effectively become anti-consumer. And as a consumer, I’m just not going to spend money on an anti-consumer marketplace.

    When Epic considers adding necessary pro-consumer measures like actual user reviews so I can hear how a game actual performs from real end users, then and only then will I consider Epic a real storefront viable for consumers.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think you’ve hit the nail on the head. Epic’s main selling point was it’s lower storefront fee (15% vs 30%, if I recall). It didn’t offer any other benefits for consumers and I think Epic realised rather quickly that the people who are actually supposed to be paying money for all of this are the buyers and not the sellers, and thus they’ve resorted to strategies like making games “exclusive” or trying to bribe players with free games.

    • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Pro-developer never needs to be anti-consumer. They are staunchly both right now.

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I agree they don’t have to be anti-consumer to be pro-developer, but my point is that that is how they are approaching being pro-developer - by limiting pro-consumer features at the behest of developers. Or perhaps I should be saying more actively publishers, to be fair.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Epic pays for exclusivity sometimes. It’s funny, I keep picking up the free epic games but I don’t think I have ever once played a single game on there.

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I claim but I don’t even have the launcher installed. If it wasn’t for the giveaways I’d completely forget about the place.

      • Xabis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I just use the heroic/legendary alternative launcher for any single player games I actually want to play from egs. It’s open source and gives epic less footprint on my machine.

        Unfortunately if you want to do anything multiplayer then you need the real client.

  • Mini_Moonpie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    If the list on PCGamingWiki is up to date, there aren’t many Epic exclusives anymore (only 26 currently): https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/List_of_games_exclusive_to_Epic_Games_Store

    And, earlier this year, Tim Sweeney said that many of exclusivity deals weren’t a good investment while the free games have been “magical.”

    So, it seems like a problem that is solving itself over time. Epic will probably still have exclusives going forward, but I would expect them to target a few high-value exclusives like they got with Alan Wake 2. Or, maybe they will just do more acquisitions of games to self-publish, like they did with Rocket League and Fall Guys.

  • Xylight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    If there’s an epic games game you want but don’t want to use the epic launcher or you’re on Linux, Heroic Games launcher id a good choice

  • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Gee maybe you should sue epic and make them carry other stores apps and not lock in their payment system and allow downloading steam from their store for giga karma.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Valve kills physical ownership of games: I sleep

    Games exclusive to Origin: I sleep

    Games exclusive to whatever the fuck Blizzard made: I sleep

    Games exclusive to Microsoft Store: I sleep

    Games exclusive to Epic: REAL SHIT

    • kworpy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      don’t hide the full story, they pay devs millions to keep their games exclusive to epic for a year. that is an extremely scummy business practice that you are rewarding and encouraging if you buy from this shitfest of a platform

      • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        they pay devs millions

        I mean I see this as a good thing. I have to keep a separate launcher around but… at least that dev is getting a great deal and will probably be able to support that game for a while (or start their next one)

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        When Half Life 2 launched, you had to register your game with Steam before you could play it. You had to give up your physical ownership of the product, and lock it to yourself. You couldn’t sell it to anyone else, or even let them play it.

        That’s what you were encouraging by buying from that shitfest of a platform.

        I really don’t see how bunging devs money for publishing rights is worse. The devs clearly don’t see it that way.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          You couldn’t sell it to anyone else, or even let them play it.

          Epic lets you sell your games to someone else?

          As to your 2nd point I play my friend’s games all the time. I haven’t purchased Satisfactory but have almost 100% it on Steam playing my friend’s copy.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago
            1. No. You can with physical. Well, before that just meant a steam key with a disc.

            2. That come much later. Try to keep up.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              So we’re talking about everything except this moment in time?

              1. Epic doesn’t have disks either so it’s irrelevant to the discussion of Epic games. If you want to complain about eliminating physical media try talking about it in regards to someplace that actually sells physical media.

              If Steam is bad because no physical media then so is Epic.

              1. But I guess Epic is okay because of how things are right now right? but I shouldn’t bring up how things are on Steam right now? In direct comparison?

              Pick an era in time you would like to complain about, and if it’s the early 2000s then go bitch to people in the early 2000s. I’m sure many of them are complaining about the loss of physical media. People still used Steam anyway and now it’s the norm. Now people are complaining about exclusivity deals, if people still use Epic anyway then that will become the norm.

      • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        They’re paying indie devs millions to remain exclusive for a year. What’s scummy is the Steam fanboys who see that and think it’s better for gamers if those games just aren’t financially successful.

    • bonfire921@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Its because the other exclusives are the devs/publishers launcher. While epic was actively seeking those 1year exclusivity deals to get more users on the platform.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        So it would be better if it was a permanent exclusivity deal, like traditional publishers have?

        They’ve been paying out in advance in some cases (Epic Mega Grants, I think) so the devs can finish the game. That’s basically the definition of what publishers do, but when Epic do it it’s somehow “not publishing”?

        • bonfire921@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Well it really depends how you look at it. For the devs it’s better in terms of how much they get per purchase given that epic takes a lower cut than steam, IIRC 15% as opposed to 30%.

          But many users hate epic as a platform seeing how it’s not as mature in features, and probably just pure love of steam.

          What I’m actually wondering about is if it’s worth signing the exclusivity deal seeing how some people will not bother buying a game on a platform they hate or do enough people purchase for it to even out and even gain a larger profit.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            steam and valve has also been generally more respectful with users than mostly any other online business, not even just in the space of online software stores. of course it’s not all rainbows and glitter but the point stands.

          • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            I don’t give any attention to the arguments that Steam is “more mature” in regards to features, when the vast majority of users don’t use those features to begin with. Steam has all the community features (and more) of Discord, but I would wager most of the fanboys in this thread don’t even know about that, or where to find those community features, let alone actually use them.

  • nawa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I mean I guess that means you don’t like the game that much if your priorities are to skip it because of the store.

    • scbasteve7@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Steam has made great strides in helping to make the gaming scene more consumer friendly. They constantly have sales, make refunds extremely easy (and in some cases have forced refunds), and are even now setting guidelines to battle passes and how you can’t just advertise it as a battle pass and instead have to list whats in it. Epic hates consumers and their main business strategy is to force business by paying publishers to only release on their store.

      It doesn’t matter how good the game is, I’m not purchasing from a store that doesn’t have the customer in mind.

      Unless it’s food. Cause then I would starve.

      • nawa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Nothing of this that you’ve described is related to the one specific game. I don’t really like Epic Store because it has a shitty UI, but I like Alan Wake 2 enough to want to buy it on release. I don’t want a personal crusade to stand in a way of me enjoying a great game. I don’t give a shit, honestly, I will get my favorite games wherever they are available as long as it’s on PC.

        • scbasteve7@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          That’s because I wasn’t talking about my opinion of the game. I was talking about my opinions on the store. Crazy how I wouldn’t bring up the game when the conversation is about the store. And that’s okay. That’s your choice. I really don’t care. I was just offering some perspective that I thought was help and would benefit you and others. You know, how commenting typically works in platforms such as this.

          Let me rephrase it for you. If the game i have the most hours in and I love the most suddenly became an epic exclusive I would never play it again.

          And just to make you happy, I don’t like Alan Wake, not my cup of tea.

          Also the “one specific game” isnt even mentioned in the post?? That wasn’t the point of the post??

          • nawa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Thank you for bringing me up to date on all the Epic Store hate opinions, not like I’ve read that a million times before. I’m glad you decided that the conversation was about the store when my original comment was about a game. Why are you changing the topic of discussion?

            The “one specific game” wasn’t mentioned, yes. Just to me it’s pretty weird to make decisions on whether I like the game or not, based on the store and not the quality of the game itself. So I stated my opinion on that part specifically. You know, how commenting typically works in platforms such as this.

                • scbasteve7@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Well you brought up your opinion. Which is fine. It’s valid. I don’t agree with it, but that’s for you to keep, not me. But then I gave you my opinion. And now you seem upset and irate. You posted an epic store neutral opinion in a thread where nearly everyone is dogging on them. And you seemed clueless. So I gave my perspective on the epic game store. Maybe you just didn’t know, you did seem a little clueless. But then you just got angry. And now I’m wondering if you have brain worms. Because who in their sane mind, would walk into a tiki bar, and then start stomping on the toes of everyone wearing a Hawaiian shirt. And you can at least cure brain worms.

  • hightrix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I know this is unpopular, but I don’t understand why people care so much about which storefront they use to buy a game. I buy it where it is cheapest.

    Hell, Epic takes less of a share of the sale. It is better for devs.

    For me, the social aspect of the store I buy games from is irrelevant.

    • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      One reason is Valve has put a fuckton of effort into linux support. So for linux users, buying a game on Steam means it’s probably going to work right out of the box. Buying from Epic, it’s a crapshoot.

      For example, I spent hours trying to get Red Dead Redemption 2 that I had bought from Epic to work. Never did, something with rockstar launcher compatibility. Gave up and bought it again on Steam, worked the first time I hit play.

  • JDTIV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Honestly we should probably have more places to buy games not just steam. Because remember when gabe newell dies there’s no guarantee that steam will still be “good” they are still a corporation. So if epic needs exclusives to keep going we should support that. Competition between corporations is a good thing.

    • Zoot@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      No, epic is already significantly worse than steam and hasn’t gotten better in years. We could use good competition, that is for sure, but Epic with all of its exclusives should not be celebrated.