Should France and the UK share their nuclear weapons with the rest of Europe?

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    In case you missed it, the US just effectively abandoned NATO. What security you think it has, it doesn’t. Which also means you can’t depend on any ally that depends on the US, which is all of them.

    No one is calling for an arms race, no one needs a thousand nukes. But the ability to erase the dozen biggest cities of an invader is the only effective deterrent these days.

    • nuko147@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      Yeah USA, not France and UK. Why the need to share nuclear weapons with Germany? And until USA officially pulls out (that won’t happen, the cost is too big for them too), they all are obliged to engage if any NATO member is invaded.

      • Mossheart@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        You’re missing the point. They don’t have to commit to pulling out. The fact they can’t be trusted now is enough to shake faith that if Article 5 is invoked that they’ll live up their agreement.

        Honestly, them exiting would be best, at least everyone will know where they stand. If Russia took a poke at another NATO country and Trump decided to do nothing, what is the rest of NATO gonna do? Send stern letters?

        Collective defense only works if you trust your ally with your life. Do you trust the USA right now?