SayCyberOnceMore

  • 5 Posts
  • 233 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle





  • For a NAS, like, storage on the network, keep it as simple and as reliable as possible, so avoid Ubuntu and go to the core underlying OS: Debian.

    Then just build up the functionality you need, is SMB, NFS, etc.

    Personally, I went from OMV to a home built NAS, but went with Arch as that’s what I use elsewhere (btw), so am comfortable with it, but it’s bleeding edge which isn’t always the best if some functionality changes when you’re not ready for it.

    If you’re going for a server running lots of containers, etc, then find whatever the container handler (docker?) is best on… I just put everything on bare metal, so can’t advise what’s best for containers… probably Debian again…

    But, keep it simple.






  • Not quite clear there…

    You’re copying data from the source, to harddrives… and then to a server with different drives?

    Assuming it’s just lots of smallish data files / media and not OS files (ie don’t need symlinks, attributes, ownership, etc) then any backup software which generates hashes to be able to repair the archive during a restore would do.

    Btrfs doesn’t need LVM, but I wouldn’t use that on mobile drives.

    Or… is this one huge 80TB file?





  • Not really sure what you’re asking here

    Is Windows + UAC + no password secure?

    No.

    What is Linux protecting us from by using passwords?

    Bad humans & mistakes. But Linux doesn’t need passwords.

    Linux & Windows came from a command-line history, so things like UAC are just a GUI version of sudo (and there is (was?) a Linux equivalent if you wanted it)

    So, consider these as options on either OS. If you want it, it’s there, if you don’t, don’t - other options exist depending on your uae case (ie SSH keys, biometrics, etc…)

    To the point; not using a password is a choice on convenience over protection.