• 0 Posts
  • 58 Comments
Joined 1 个月前
cake
Cake day: 2025年10月16日

help-circle
  • I get annoyed just seeing all of these spelled out.

    Speed is an absolute requirement for a launcher, and if one of the search providers is taking too long it needs to be removed until its speed makes it usable. There’s no way I want to wait for web results if they take between 1 and 10 seconds. The number of local results should always be such that it can be held in memory without being a burden, and return in an imperceptible amount of time.


  • I have never heard anyone fully elide the first vowel sound in “the morning” -it’s a schwa. The exception is Yorkshire accents which do so, and indeed, that shows you there is more to elide in “in the” than “at”.

    “At m” is easier to say simply because it is fewer syllables - inserting more sounds rarely makes things easier to pronounce, and the fact that we say “at midday”, “at most” and “at many times” shows that there is no pressure to change these combinations of sounds.

    But the whole thing is based on the faulty, unsupported premise that “in the” and “at” are in free variation. You can’t just start saying “in the midday” because it is ungrammatical, so if there were pressure to simplify “at most” we’d simplify its pronunciation (maybe to “ab most”) not swap preposition.

    This is why I’m not giving more of a detailed argument about ease of pronunciation - because it’s not even relevant. That’s not how language picks prepositions. Like why do we say “I’m in the car” but “I’m on the bus”? I don’t know, but I suspect the answer lies in the history of the (Omni)bus, which used to often be open-topped, whereas the (motor)car was generally enclosed since its invention.

    To find the answer in the case of morning and night requires tracing the etymology of the words and understanding the grammar used at the time they arose.


  • FishFace@piefed.socialtoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksAt morning
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 天前

    The sounds of “in th” can be said without moving any part of the mouth except the tongue, so I have no idea what you mean. Like, you can see them with your teeth touching and holding your lips completely still.

    Your argument is completely post hoc to the extent that you’re forgetting whatever you were taught about phonology.

    And you’ve skipped the vowel of “the” why, exactly? That’s a whole extra syllable in “in the” compared to “at”, which is definitely not easier. Your analysis is completely based on the difference between “the m”, “the n”, “at m” and “at n” but “at the” is grammatical so what about “at the morning”?




  • FishFace@piefed.socialtoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksAt morning
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 天前

    How on earth is “in the morning” less effort than “at morning”? Doubly so for “afternoon”?

    Prepositions in general don’t follow regular patterns in English. I would bet on there being, if any explanation, an etymological one: the origin of morning, afternoon, evening and night are all different, so the constructions which have since been contracted away will have been different.











  • Yes, neural networks are, usually, AI, but no, thermostats are not AI.

    The definition of AI is more or less “a machine that can accomplish something that an intelligent thing like a human can do but which would be unfeasible or impossible to create an explicit algorithm for the machine to follow in order to accomplish it.”

    So natural language translation is AI: before it became usable in the 2000s, this was seen as something that only humans could do. Producing meaningful text and recognisable images from scratch or a prompt is AI for the same reason.

    On the threadiverse people equate AI with Artificial General Intelligence, i.e. something capable of true reasoning, with something we might call “understanding” (not a concept that I can attempt to define, but if you think about that ability which LLMs lack in spite of being able to produce text as if they had it) but this is ahistorical.