

??? This is 250kt. Not every explosive is TNT and most munitions have a non explosive component.
??? This is 250kt. Not every explosive is TNT and most munitions have a non explosive component.
Which is much cheaper than this car. Prices for small cars must go down(and big car prices going way up seems fine, TBf)
I don’t live in car land. Hence I don’t commute or shop groceries via car. Charging seems a hassle for typical trips, but I am not an experienced driver. I want mini cars to be cheaper, not go farther, so using one is more sensible.
I struggle to believe that. Packing more batteries does not mean size has to increase by a lot. the biggest part of car volume is air anyway.
17k for not even 200km range sucks. EVs must get cheaper.
Edit: This does not mean that the car sucks. It means that profits must fall. Can’t have china have a 9k for 350km car. We must be better and cheaper! Also battery costs are plummeting.
No they don’t, because I returned it before a shortage occured. They just lost the profit from rent.
No he doesn’t.
In both cases the additional cost caused by your actions is very low. Damage was still fine to the provider.
If the additional cost per user is very low people should not be priced out, still.
It still may be. Is it theft to take a rentable car without renting it?
You are getting a good without enabling it’s production. Just because the additional cost from you doing this is extremely low does not mean it ain’t theft. Just means it ain’t such a terrible thing to do.
Every one is doing that. Lowest stakes+lowest risk make brains go mush.
And that’s a good thing, if and only if you provide pathways to other jobs or phase workers out slowly i.e. by retirement.
Also: stallman is a character and has been associated with a pedophelia/ebephilia yikes semi reasonable Epstein takes and a lack of understanding that consenting sex with a minor causes harm.
“Critical Thinker” Yikes. Somehow the right made that a forbidden word in my mind because they hide behind that as an excuse for asking terrible questions etc.
Anyway. Allegedly the statistics are rather mediocre for self driving cars. But sadly I haven’t seen a good statistic about that, either. The issue here is that automatable tasks are lower risk driving situations so having a good statistic is near impossible. E.g. miles driven are heavily skewed when you are only used on highways as a driver. There are no simple numbers that will tell you anything of worth.
That being said the title should be about the mistake that happened without fundamental statements (i.e. self driving is bad because motorcyclists die).
You should measure expenses in bullets, shells and bombs. Not in who managed to pay the most money for them.
A couch that has an outlet integrated into it ain’t as mind-blowing as you seem to think. In particular considering it is a low power outlet.
That’s not always good. Maybe they just did not read the handle and assumed someone random asked, but didn’t know they wanted this library. That’s probably a good assumption, too.
Middle right has a foreskin…
Maybe some facial features might sell it better, but they don’t very much look like rams already.
This sounds like a medical term though
For fucks sake, have the 0 at the twelve o clock position and not this horrible mess. This ruins one’s day.
Bad experiences from the past are valid reasons to be apprehensive.
You mental? Homesteading is not plausible for most since it requires a whole lot of money to buy an acceptable property in reach of their job. In particular Europeans. Also funding a business is a risky endeavor.
Didn’t know fusion energy was a photovoltaics company. Guess that makes sense judging from the name.
Hope they deliver a lot of TWh/annum by next year.