Hatsune Miku

i wonder why this reuters article is being downvoted

This is such good news. Now the challenge is to keep both sides from reigniting.

There was a ceasefire already in place prior to the 7th of October attacks

of your claims that they bombed hospitals

i didn’t know israel is beheading people with garden hoes :o

uh-huh~ and your proof?

okay, can you link any evidence of hospitals being bombed?

they haven’t actually bombed al shifa, or any hospital for that matter.

well this community suddenly became very quiet.

I dunno why i bother when you just ignore all the evidence that the BBC can’t be trusted.

And Israeli response to the massacre?

And your sources?

They have bombed the hospital.

That was a flare shell that unfortunately fell onto a civilian area. Accidents happen in wars, especially in such a densely populated area. Militants have their fair share of accidents as well, where their missiles, unfortunately, fell onto a civilian area.

Also reports of tank shots firing into the building from Aljazeera phone calls with doctors on site however those are without video evidence

Al Jazeera cannot be trusted to be factual and impartial. They have Clear bias and Poor credibility. They are funded entirely by the Qatari government. The same Qatar government that houses Hamas leadership. The same Qatar that meets with media mongrels and funds twitter. The same twitter that is notoriously known for being astroturfed. Submissions from Al Jazeera aren’t even allowed on this community because of all this.

And israel killed all ICU patients and multiple premature babies by blockading the hospital and preventing it from getting supplies.

Isn’t blame on both Hamas and Israel for this because they are both fighting around a hospital?

very curious to hear where your source comes from, since there have been no reports thus far of IDF bombing hospitals.

140,000 litres of fuel

Israel’s extreme response is because Hamas killed roughly one thousand innocent lives and also captured civilian and military hostages. How do you get them back while responding to the attack?

I’m not buying anything the BBC says regarding this conflict. They have repeatedly had to apologise for flat-out lying during their reporting.

As BBC News covered initial reports that Israeli forces had entered Gaza’s main hospital, we said that “medical teams and Arab speakers” were being targeted. This was incorrect and misquoted a Reuters report. We should have said IDF forces included medical teams and Arabic speakers for this operation. We apologise for this error, which fell below our usual editorial standards. The correct version of events was broadcast minutes later and we apologised for the mistake on air later in the morning.

They also had the government warn them of their impartial reporting during an anti-semitic attack, where they claimed that the Jewish victim perpetuated the attack.

Oh, but there’s even more. In 2004, the former BBC Director of News commissioned a report into the impartiality of the BBC reporting on conflicts in the Middle East, particularly Israel-Palestine. The BBC spent £330,000 in legal costs (not including staff or VAT) contesting again and again the findings of the report, themselves refusing to publically release the report’s findings. Fighting in court repeatedly against activists for almost a decade to withhold the report findings is extremely suspicious.

The BBC’s history of being biased or misleading shows they cannot be trusted for news in the middle-east.

We can take a step back and ask why guns made of metal were anywhere near an MRI, but we can also ask where the IDF supposedly “found” the original guns.

Because without electricity, the MRI is off? Hospitals don’t tend to use MRIs during extraordinary crises due to power consumption.

Also of note is that the laptop shown at the end of the “uncut” al-Shifa video… Uses an Israeli power plug and displays an IDF soldier. The IDF later took the video down and re-uploaded it with that picture blurred.

Yes, in the video, they say that it was one of their captured soldiers. As for the power plug, I don’t see what that proves? The soldiers plugged in the laptop to view its contents? Hamas had an Israeli power bank? The main issue is that there were guns inside the hospital, which violates Article 19 of the Geneva Convention, which means that the hospital loses its immunity–that’s the problem worth noting here.

A planted gun? As in the IDF put it there?

and how do you get the hostages back and launch a counteroffensive because Hamas broke the ceasefire that was in place?

they’re actually in multiple

they’ve shown the tunnels before tho