https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/d3/t/single-player-offline-option/9797

offline solo is only for consoles.

https://expertbeacon.com/can-you-play-diablo-3-in-offline-mode/

https://kotaku.com/in-the-end-diablo-iii-just-shouldnt-have-been-always-1624648696

https://expertbeacon.com/is-diablo-3-still-online-only/

https://cyberpost.co/is-diablo-3-still-always-online/

https://www.pcgamer.com/diablo-3-always-online-requirement-critical-to-d3s-long-term-integrity-says-blizzard-boss/

Turns out the game is always-online

Just like the game before it. Which also had tacky micro-transactions.

I’ll let you guess what Diablo 5 will be like.

Why does the graph go anti-clockwise?

For those OOTL (like I was):

https://time.com/7285796/james-comey-86-47-trump-threat-investigation-instagram-post-fbi/

Let me sell you a Trump steak.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_Steaks

Maybe they didn’t know.

“Maybe they weren’t aware of their surroundings while driving a vehicle.”

The vast majority of coding isn’t making something new, it’s using existing patterns and tools and arranging them to fit a specific use case.

I would argue that arranging something to fit a specific use case is making something new.

Ask any designer how difficult it is to get a spec sheet from a client and meet their expectations. We’re expecting LLMs to suddenly solve this problem.

Llms may not be able to create a new framework or design pattern

Until they can do this, there is little threat to designers. There will be less grunt work, of course.

The sad reality is that code is just a form of language, and LLMs are good at learning languages.

This is debatable. LLMs are prediction machines.

What use is prediction when you are trying to code something new?

Nah, to get hairs you need to send back French toast. Just like in this demonstration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNfciDzZTNM

Too many cooks spoil the broth.

Follow the money. Where do the tariffs end up?

Per the article, they just developed a faster algorithm for a specific type of material simulation.

You’re underplaying it.

As per the article:

This has broad implications for industries that require detailed material analysis, including:

Aerospace and Defense: Improved modeling of material stress and failure in aircraft structures.

Engineering and Manufacturing: More efficient testing of materials for construction and industrial applications.

Military Research: Faster development of impact-resistant materials for defense systems.

This is why:

“It ain’t stupid if it works.”

is fundamentally incorrect.

The one you use.

It says in the article

Unlike conventional batteries, supercapacitors have an exceptionally long lifespan, lasting hundreds of thousands of charge-discharge cycles, whereas lithium batteries typically last only five years or less.

It doesn’t say what type of capacitor is used

Yes, it does. They’re supercapacitors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMd--Wyfw0g

In the first age

in the first battle

Not sure why you were downvoted, you are correct. You can’t even say “Winnie the Pooh”.

https://gamerant.com/marvel-rivals-banned-words-winnie-the-pooh/

NetEase is the developer of Marvel Rivals. They are a huge Chinese based company, they have ties to the CCP.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetEase https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvel_Rivals

Maybe that’s because the patriarchy favours a minority of men.

Go read The Will to Change, then come back and tell me that the majority of men are having a grand time.

You’re picturing the men at the top, which are few. The majority suffer.