All of this user’s content is licensed under CC BY 4.0.

  • 18 Posts
  • 272 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: October 20th, 2023
  • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.worksOPtoMildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issuesEnglish
    112·
    23 days ago

    […] Who’s that […]?

    I presume they are referring to @nutomic@lemmy.ml [1]; nutomic is one of the main Lemmy developers [1.1].

    Context? […] what does he have to do with this post?

    If they are indeed referring to @nutomic@lemmy.ml, I presume they are mentioning nutomic because the example GitHub repository that I cited [3] is owned by nutomic [2]; that being said, specifically regarding their claim itself that nutomic is transphobic [4] and is a genocide denier [4], it is entirely off topic, imo.

    I will make no comment on the veracity of the claim itself without evidence. I do not wish to speak for nutomic — I will let them speak for themself here should they wish.

    References
    1. Type: Webpage (Profile). Name: “@nutomic@lemmy.ml”. Publisher: [“@nutomic@lemmy.ml”. “Lemmy” (“lemmy.ml”). “Lemmy”.]. Accessed: 2025-04-03T01:58Z. URI: https://lemmy.ml/u/nutomic.
      1. Biography.

        Lemmy maintainer

    2. Type: Webpage. Name: “Nutomic/ibis”. Publisher: [“Nutomic”. GitHub]. Published: 2025-04-02T14:42:54.000Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T02:00Z. URI: https://github.com/Nutomic/ibis.
      • One can see in the repository identifier “Nutomic/ibis” that it is owned by “Nutomic”.
    3. Type: Post. Title: “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [“Mildly Infuriating” (“!mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:06:34Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T02:03Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627.

      […] I recently encountered one of these AI bots in Ibis’s GitHub repository.

      • Ibis is the cited GitHub repository.
    4. Type: Comment. Author: “Deceptichum@quokk.au”. Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [“Mildly Infuriating” (“!mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:06:34Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:36:27Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T02:08Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627.

      Eww Nutomic the transphobic genocide denier.

  • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.workstoWorld News@lemmy.world•Mandatory jail term for Nazi salute under new hate crime rules in AustraliaEnglish
    1·
    2 months ago

    […] If you don’t support imprisoning people who hold these views that directly lead to the death of many innocent people, the taking over of people’s land/homes, the destruction of democratic systems, and the elimination of entire races of people from populations, then you are inherently tolerating their beliefs.

    To me, it feels like you are conflating some things here: I draw a distinction between how I try to conduct myself (and, by extension, how I think society should conduct itself), and how I think a government should conduct itself. Any common overlap, while it may theoretically draw from the same core personal beliefs, is more of a coincidence in practice, imo. Yes, I think that society should not socially tolerate any of these behaviors, and I think that society should take an active position to socially oppose them; but I don’t believe that a government should take action unless the well-being of an individual is actively under threat.

    I could be wrong in my interpretation, but all of your examples seem to simply a be a difference of opinion (no matter how abhorrent and unpalatable an opinion may be). I don’t believe that one should be legally punished for a difference of opinion. The only one that may have some legal ground, in my opinion, as I currently understand your examples, is

    Supporting dictatorship, authoritarianism, or totalitarianism as a concept or goal

    but that would depend on how you are defining “support”.