• 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 11th, 2025

help-circle
  • They will couple the retirement age to life expectancy and this parameter will drop in future. I’m pretty sure we are currently around the peak value of how old the average person will get. Climate change will result in millions of premature deaths every year worldwide. Heat waves will get much more deadly, more pandemics, more extreme flash floods, tornados, storms will kill additionally. Fungi already kill a lot of old people and nobody really knows that or cares about it, despite the WHO’s warning of 8 very harmful species of fungi and their urge to invest more in prevention. Global food and water supply will get pretty precarious. More toxins accumulate in the environment. We see more wars and violence, less stable economies, more social unrest… How can any sane person expect people will live longer under those conditions? Just because conditions have improved for decades doesn’t mean it will never get worse again.



  • Strictly speaking, there isn’t even consensous amongst roman-catholics about what “hell” is and if it’s even part of the religion or maybe just the result of a translation issue. Also, believing in magic numbers is definitely not part of modern catholic christendom. Those people seem to abuse religion to spread their own culture-oppressing beliefs.

    I accuse the BBC of giving too much attention to a collection of close-minded, destructive people without investigating the facts and exposing their irrationality.




  • The only valid critic point is that they should remove taxes from raw vegetables, fruit and other basic food items, because increasing consumption of those to replace sugary processed food will really boost health. As of now, they only do half the job and thereby turning all this “it’s good you health” talk into a fat lie. It’s only about money, nothing else.




  • MattR@feddit.orgtoEurope@feddit.orgDigital ID? Hold on....
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    100% entirely incorrect. Data processing can happen without consent. Otherwise I could just tell my tax office to not store data about me and wouldn’t need to pay taxes. This is obviously not possible. In the end, art. 6 1. c) could justify such processing. Parental consent as described in art. 8 is only needed if Art. 6 1. a) were the sole justification.










  • MattR@feddit.orgtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldok then
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    In instances where there is no legal way to watch something piracy hurts nobody as the company would not have made money from me anyway. It doesn’t even hurt the artists, the refusal of the distributer to offer content worldwide is the real scandal that everyone in the creative industry should tackle.


  • In my experience way too many people are ignorant in regards of negative effects of AI usage and the data centers, both in regard to global environmental problems and the catastrophic consequences for the local population in the vincinity of large data centers. And there is the partially illegal acquisition/processing of training data, esp. the permanent storage of the original copyrighted works. That kind of ignorance is far worse than being ignorant to the couple of use cases where AI can be helpful. And that’s why I dislike AI-fan-boying.