I am trying to focus on posting source documents, as opposed to someone else’s reporting on source documents.

#ExecuteTrump
We don’t criticize people for things they did not choose
If the punishment is a fine, it’s only illegal for poor people
American Fascist Party
We call people what they want to be called
I decline to answer any questions without an attorney present, and I do not consent to any search
Seize the means of production
Some of those who work forces are the same that burn crosses

  • 5 Posts
  • 147 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle




  • The article refers to ActivityPub-based “microblogging” by assuming that Mastodon is the only client application available for that purpose. It is not. Mastodon is certainly the most popular client application for that purpose, but it doesn’t have to be. Other client applications exist, and a better or more popular client application could be created.

    When the point of the article is to get people to comprehend that federated social media is not a “walled garden” –

    People are using open, free Mastodon, but in their minds, they are still in a walled garden.

    maintaining the notion that a single client application is the only way to read or create a certain kind of content is a big part of the very problem the article describes.

    And the author seems to be aware of this:

    Often, I hear about people trying to explain the idea behind Mastodon to someone, who is not on the Fediverse, they often explain it with e-mail. However, nowadays, people don’t even experience this “choice of service” even with e-mail anymore. They get their e-mail when signing up with google and that’s it.

    GMail is not the only way to send and receive SMTP email. It’s certainly a very popular way to do so, but you wouldn’t describe a concern over people being blind to their choices of email providers (or, indeed, their ability to host their own email server) as

    The current [GMail]-signup is only removing the confusion of users on first glance, because it either hides the server-choice altogether, or leaves them with a choice that is impossible to make at this point of their [GMail]-journey.

    If the author, or anyone else, wants people to have a better understanding of the nature of federated social media, describing it wrong is not a path to that goal.





  • What about the individual??

    Flat effect no ambition misery? Or creative powerhouse and visionary?

    Personal experience: I spent my entire youth and a large portion of my adulthood being amazingly preoccupied with sex, and with a fair amount of aggression towards everyone and everything.

    Between testiulcar cancer, many consistent years of antidepressants, and just being old, I am finally feeling relief from those. I don’t claim to be a “creative powerhouse and visionary” by any stretch, but I am far from having a flat affect, I’m no more or less ambitious than I was before, and I am decidedly less miserable.

    In hindsight, I can see that libido and aggression have always been an obstacle to my reaching my potential. Having built some bad habits over decades, they still are. None of us get to accomplish everything we want, so I’m trying not to fret about it too much.

    Overall, as an individual whose life experience has changed from one extreme to the other - whether hormones have anything to do with it or not - I much prefer the current stage in my life to the former.