The Defeat of One’s Own Government in the Imperialist War?

It may become relevant to a lot of us pretty soon.

This is insulting, we’re worth so much more than that.

LINE MUST GO UP

Time to change domain and pretend to be libs to infiltrate their shitty instances again!

You can do whatever you want with your life. If you’re not comfortable with going, then you shouldn’t go.

You should also ask yourself if you’ll be ok in the future with the idea that your and your brother’s opinion about a third person, who isn’t a part about either of your lives, is a valid ground for potentially breaking forever your relationship with your brother. Maybe simply avoiding this topic that creates tensions would be enough?

Neither of you is an asshole.

Beautiful ✨🥲

You can go and ask if you want, but you will be mocked because of how ridiculously brainwashed you’ll sound.

Votes for people 0-17 count double so they should vote extra hard.

No I don’t have any idea what they’re talking about either.

“Scratch a liberal a fascist bleeds” has to be one of the most ridiculous things ever said.

It’s not ridiculous, it’s simply historically true. Go ask any European and they’ll explain to you how Hitler, Mussolini, and Franco got to power.

They’ll also tell you how in all their respective countries, the liberals are currently normalizing the far right in their media to counter the rise of leftist movements.

Edit: oh and also, every liberal government is currently supporting the Palestinian genocide, so that should be a pretty big clue too.

Très bien merci pour l’info, je m’en souviendrais.

Oui j’ai hesité à le mettre dans sur /c/monde, mais j’ai decidé de le mettre finalement ici puisque la France a participé au vote. Tu prefererais reserver cette commu à l’actualité spécifique à la France alors ?

Je ne comprend vraiment pas l’interet de tes commentaires. Pourquoi écrire si tu ne souhaites pas participer à la discussion ?

Pourrais-tu m’expliquer pourquoi la censure est si importante pour toi ?

Je t’ai downvoté parce que tu n’as fait que copier coller une partie de l’article, sans y ajouter ni commentaire, ni contexte.

Ce contenu est deja visible par tout le monde dans la publication donc le commentaire n’apporte rien à la discussion, c’est bien dans ces cas là que la fonction de downvote se justifie.

Oui, c’est dégueulasse. On préfère continuer le génocide plutôt que voter un cesser le feu parce qu’on aimerait bien voir le Hamas mentionné dans le texte.

Je suis curieux de voir quelle excuse ils vont nous trouver pour rejeter le texte du Brésil.

Caroline Yadan est une députée Renaissance, revendiquée de “centre”. L’image est dans l’ensemble applicable sur leurs discours habituels, mais dans le cas présent on est sur la partie en bas à gauche : “both sides are equally bad”.

“Un mouvement d’extreme droite est dissolu pour cause d’antisémitisme, donc ils faut dissoudre l’opposition de gauche parce qu’ils sont aussi antisémites” (???)

Ni de droite, ni de gauche.

So the spelling is irregular, so what. You’ll be bad at spelling for a while.

People mostly learn languages by reading.

having to memorize arbitrary gender for every noun in the language, learn complex verb conjugations, polite and impolite forms and make every verb and adjective agree with the nouns in gender and number

If you mess those up, people will still understand you. Saying “un chaise” instead of “une chaise” doesn’t change the meaning and everyone knows what you’re saying.

However, if you learn english words through text and then try to use them vocally, nobody will understand you. (looking at you “beard”, who isn’t pronounced at all like “bear” for some reason)

There is absolutely no correlation between spoken and written english, so in practice it’s the same as having to learn two languages at once. Even adult native speakers still aren’t sure how to pronounce simple 1 syllable words such as “route” or “vase”, that’s pretty telling how confusing that language is.

Socrates was already criticising it in 450 BC. This is nothing new nor revolutionary and people were already questioning their actions when “the world was shit” as you put it.

People can strive to become better in any situation.

Well, that’s new.

Anarchism is a sub-ideology of communism that seeks to abolish all kind of unjustified hierarchy, including capitalism. It’s the farthest left ideology.

“Anarcho-capitalist” is a strange concept that’s very recent and only seem to exist in the USA, that tries to reimagine feudalism in the industrial age, meaning that very rich people are free to have their own army and own massive area of land, where people living there will subjected to the laws of that lord, with no possibility to remove them through voting. It really doesn’t have anything in common with anarchy.

You can read more on the wikipedia page, it seems to be pretty good.

I’m so happy I can be a part of this historical moment.