Primarily0617

They have their own people

microsoft has QA?

that’s a gibibyte

a gigabyte is 10^9

the point of the original post is that artificially fixing a bias in training data post-training is a bad idea because it ends up in weird scenarios like this one

your comment is saying that the original post is dumb and betrays a lack of knowledge because artificially fixing a bias in training data post-training would obviously only result in weird scenarios like this one

i don’t know what your aim is here

any AI person training their algorithms on AI generated data is liable to get fired

though this isn’t pertinent to the post in question, training AI (and by AI I presume you mean neural networks, since there’s a fairly important distinction) on AI-generated data is absolutely a part of machine learning.

some of the most famous neural networks out there are trained on data that they’ve generated themselves -> e.g., AlphaGo Zero

but that is not a fix

congratulations you stumbled upon the reason this is a bad idea all by yourself

all it took was a bit of actually-reading-the-original-post

isn’t that just how you make gravy?

thank u its my opinion too

how could you know the total participant count is 37 ahead of time if you’re currently looking for sign ups

also, a book exchange of 37 people doesn’t strike me as particularly “huge”

but pay it forward can work in theory

this can’t even work in theory because books entering the system 1 at a time and leaving the system 36 at a time requires 35 books to be conjured out of thin air

that just sounds like saying “six” with a french accent

im not sure i believe you

“six” in english translates to “six” in french

i don’t know what to do with this information

if thought truly is entirely deterministic, then it’s surely both sufficient and necessary that you could build a machine that, given the state of the universe as input, could fully simulate what your answer to any given question would be

but if you suppose that, then you basically run into an issue very similar to the halting problem

you put your subject in the room with your magic machine, tell them to disagree with whatever the machine spits out, then tell the magic machine to predict what they’re going to say after they’ve been told the result of said prediction

whatever the machine spits out, there’s nothing stopping your subject from just disagreeing

im only 6

I don’t really care whose fault it is I just want to play my blideo blames

it might be reliable for running a mainframe, but running a mainframe isn’t really what i want to do in my free time

it’s more convenient for me to put a frozen ready meal in the oven for 30 minutes than it is for me to make dinner, even though the act of making dinner might take less than 30 minutes

yes linux is definitely only “slightly” more convenient than windows, and also definitely more reliable

in unrelated news i’m now into my 5th hour trying to get 2077 to run without freezing, and my system has only hard-crashed about 3 times during the process

i won’t rest until every driver in america is forced into a toad of toad hall cosplay for every minute they’re on the road

• Giving effective error codes is the opposite of unhelpful
• Users who can’t figure out the underlying logic behind a GUI aren’t exactly going to thrive in a CLI environment
• The dominance of Office is because it’s better than its competitors, and because getting businesses to change literally anything they do is near impossible. SPSS isn’t even a Microsoft product.
• Troubleshooting on Linux certainly never involves “edit this root-owned file buried 6 layers deep in a cubby hole you never knew existed”, and it never involves “run this .sh script lol”.

This is an absolutely insane take

the christian god also punishes humans for ‘misusing’ their free will