

Sure, but the newest version of each package is four years old and riddled with dozens of Debian-specific patches that somehow only make it run worse.


Sure, but the newest version of each package is four years old and riddled with dozens of Debian-specific patches that somehow only make it run worse.


To my knowledge, there has been some discussion regarding the AGPL as to whether using software through a network even creates the kind of legal relationship between provider and client such that the client has standing to request the source code. I assume similar discussions would crop up regarding the SOWPL.


Shit Ben Blocks Shin Bet
I, too, have baggage that is always there wherever I go.


I think the point is that Tim Apple is all of these things (so he need not care) except straight.


I didn’t know that Broadcom’s CEO was named Hawk Tuah.


Oculus VR maker (whatever) and Trump donor/fanboy (okay, you really have a point).
what the hell is that carpet pattern?
Yes; I wanted to mention that dhcpcd is not affected because the title explicitly mentions the DHCP client (dhclient), so people might go looking for alternative DHCP clients in the comments.
I think it’s a bit confusing that you mentioned the DHCP client (dhclient) and DHCP relay (dhrelay) in the title, then link to the Arch Wiki article about the DHCP server (dhcpd). Yes, dhrelay is contained in the dhcpd package (dhclient, however, is not), but I assume most people will be using a DHCP client and few will be operating a DHCP server or relay.
On Arch, the client is in the dhclient package, which is generally also the name of the ISC DHCP client binary.
dhcpcd (DHCP Client Daemon) is not affiliated with the ISC and still appears to be under active development.
I guess all their cybersecurity measures were implemented by ChatGPT…