If you couldn’t trust anything, that would work.

But you’ll still trust whatever truth you discover on your own. And when a source repeats something you know to be true, you’ll believe them when they say something else that you can’t verify. So long as that source is internally consistent, they are going to become the verification of what is “true” for you.

For your system to work, the individual must not be able to trust their own truths.

Womp womp.

Unass my ram.

One of the first things I turn off on every new device

I would love to turn it off on everything, but on-screen keyboards are almost entirely useless without it.

I miss my SGH-T699 “Relay”, and its 5-row slider. It’s the only phone I’ve bought more than once; I wore out three of them.

Work pc so I can’t just change to linux unfortunately

WSL?

Those aren’t low-flying airplanes passing overhead.

100UL (Unleaded avgas) has finally been approved for spark-ignition aviation engines just in the past couple years.

Manufacturers have finally gotten approval to build/retrofit popular small aircraft with compression-ignition engines. These can burn Jet-A in a diesel cycle instead of 100LL. Jet-A is more energy dense than 100LL, and it is cheaper.

We’re finally in a regulatory position where the GA fleet can actually transition to unleaded fuels.

“Won’t someone think of the children?”

NO.

I don’t know, but keep asking this question. These businesses are a scourge.

Rinse. Drop in airfryer for 35 minutes. Chip dip.

Zero-day exploits are security holes that exist and are used by bad actors, but aren’t yet known to you, or anyone capable of closing the hole. The clock to patch the hole doesn’t start running until the exploit is known: it stands at zero days until the good guys know it exists.

What zero-day exploits exist for ssh?

By definition, you don’t know. So, you block root login, and hope the bad actor doesn’t also know a zero-day for sudo.

immigration lawyer born in Newton, Massachusetts,

I’m guessing they intended to send this notice to one of this lawyer’s clients, rather than the lawyer themself?

I’ve started referring to them as the “Problem Class”

Chicago did that.

Turned out to be a crock of shit.

In 1912, “Servia” was the accepted English spelling. British journalists started using “Serbia” around 1914.

IMO, email isn’t for answering questions. Email is for documenting that the conversation occurred.

If they won’t answer the questions in email, ask them in a phone call, then send a “Per our conversation” email summarizing the answers they provided. Until they send a rebuttal, I am free to act as though my email was their answer.

Take your upvote and choke on it, prick.

/s

Irrelevant to the issue at hand: Even private sales are prohibited between residents of different states unless the sale is conducted through an FFL dealer in the buyer’s/recipient’s state.

But to answer your question: Very few states restrict private sales beyond federal requirements.

The only viable means of being able to reliably prosecute private sales to prohibited persons is to make NICS checks available, freely and anonymously, to the general public. With such checks readily and freely available, sellers cannot reasonably argue that they “didn’t know” someone was a prohibited buyer. With those checks available, “I didn’t know” is no longer exculpatory evidence. With those checks available, you can reasonably know their status; you should know their status; your failure to check is evidence of criminal negligence.

But every time “Public Access to NICS” has been proposed in the past 20+ years, Democratic leadership stops it, because it conflicts with their “no guns for anyone” ideology.

FFL dealers can only sell to residents of states in which they are licensed to operate. It is unlawful for a resident of one state to sell to a resident of another state, without involving an FFL dealer licensed in the receiver’s state.

Nah, I’ll just use my “Tariff Dividend” check when Trump writes it. China will pay for it.