Everyone who did not go to vote, accepted and is ok with him. I think voting in a way that makes your vote not count is a better statement. If majority of non-voters are really against it, you would see it if 20+% would vote but in a way it doesn’t count. For non-voters, i assume they voted for the winner. Nothing else makes sense for me. Also it still showed that more cared for him vs people caring for someone else.
One man representing how many voters?
“from Brussels” -> so Politician are the final stage evolution of the Mafia?
And also what about the real unfair advantage of someone who inherits a fortune?
Yes. I think that is well done by Baden-Württemberg “Following an amendment to the Smoke-Free Environment Law in Baden-Württemberg”. Completely reasonable for everyone. That this even needs a regulation.
Congratulations, well done.
No those are dismantled first because they are the most visible iconic thing that also outputs scary big white smoke! /s Nice idea but i really think those are gone first because they are the biggest virtue signal. Humans are weird.
Markt regelt! The market regulates itself. Please touch more of that you oh so mighty invisible Hand of the market!
I would like to also see multiple train lines so that there is an extra track just for transporting goods or so public transport does not have to be stopped just because one track has to be repaired or other maintenance. Some dedicated special high speed tracks would also be very cool and if i could dream, have more night trains that can make vacations in Europe cheaper.
Isn’t Copenhagen and other bike friendly cities using bike lanes specifically to not have Bikes and Cars on the same lane? Cars are also great and super flexible, but cities should be designed in a way you can get easily from one to another by car, bus or train without needing to drive through other cities. For smaller cities it would be ideal to get to its outskirts with great and cheap parking places and can change to public transport or smaller things like bike or e-roller or similar. Historical grown cities and driveways have the drawback of having main roads and only connections going through areas they should not. There is a lot more to good traffic planning than not overtaking and reducing speed limits to 30.
And the use case is only for visual appeal? Good for those who need that. Probably can add advertisement on it to make it cheaper? I’m fine with normal looking one. Maybe it is beneficial, as it might reduce the performance at first but might keep temperatures lower and so increases efficiency again? Solar power is just great and it should get to a point where there is no more question about if it is worth it and will just get added to every roof that gets sun.
Bikes and Cars do not work well together. You will never have car free cities, even in small towns in EU, if you can’t drive around it with a faster road. Cities should not be build around important short and fast traffic roads, but that is how they are grown historical. Situation in rural areas is also very different to bigger cities. I would also say 30 is far from great for bikes. Most normal people drive slower and some drive faster. Speed is not the answer. Cars and bikes need different lanes. Everything longer than ~25km to work will be for cars or public transport. A good transition to having better transport will take a long time and reducing speeds to 30 is not a good solution.
30 is awful. I like 40 and 60 so much more. 30 might be still better than awful timed red lights.
The red light timings sometimes incentivizes to go faster as with 55-60km/h you can have a green wave and don’t need stop at any red light. for that it is totally worth it to drive faster. i hate when red light phase is longer than green phase. there are some really bad decisions on how red light timings work. Most do drive their path to work twice and know the timings and those do know when to drive faster/slower and will drive more aggressive to not wait at that one stupidly timed red light and have to wait and have like 25% more time to commute twice! (20->25min). It’s nice to calculate it with statistics but the way to work and back is better known and a slower driver might cause you to need to wait at multiple red lights while you could have driven a bit faster (and not always faster like in my first sentence but driving as fast as is allowed) and did not have to wait at any of that stupid red lights. I’m all for speed limits and better bike lanes etc. but driving slow when it’s stupid and stealing others precious time is fucking awful. What i also like are those that drive 60-70 constantly. Fuck man drive 100 if it is allowed and you can and drive 50 in the city but know, slow you down and than don’t even drive slower for the safety of entices in the city.
And who is media? The good old follow the money. Sure there is also money on good progressive things, but currently some wealthy invest more into things that help those few wealthy people. Democracy means a majority should decide but this is undermined by money from few very wealthy influencing decisions by a majority, so that you could say decisions are influenced and done by a few wealthy without good intentions for majority of people.
“Media”. Money is what happens all the time. More money was invested into bashing them and it worked.
Problem here is also capitalism. If those who have capital/own and make their money through owning have all the time free and still make more money. -> more money -> can pay more to others to do what they want. -> those with more can do and organize more of “their” education -> democracy still fucked by capitalism or not, depending on who has the capital and what those want -> not democratic (, as only some are deciding what is done and those are not even the one who know stuff).
Probably Fico is who i thinking of. He resigned after a lot of protest. Vučić in Serbia is also a good candidate to go away. It’s incredible how people in Hungary, Slovakia and Serbia think Russia and China are helping them while EU contributions and single contributions from all kind of different EU countries contribute so much more to their countries than Russia or China, even together those two don’t invest in those countries compared to EU.
In my you clearly agree with who wins. My point was that if you disagree with all, you go vote but in a way it is registered as “mistake/error/wrong” vote. That way you don’t vote for one, as you don’t like any and your vote still gets counted. No one can tell anyone that if a big percentage voted “wrong/erroneous” that all those were not able to vote. That does not happen, only if (at least the majority) did show with this that they did not want to vote for anyone. They wanted to vote and therefor gave their vote, but in a way it gets counted without giving the vote to anyone. If you stay away from voting, you are ok with whoever wins. Either way it’s already something wrong if you have to think about this situation.