• 0 Posts
  • 100 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle
  • They can be. Anathem was a bit more of a slog that sped up.

    I found cryptonomicon to be slow at first (but not like Anathem) but it sped up quickly.

    It goes back and forth between “modern” early 00’s? And WW2.

    Stephenson is the kind of author you start a book and after a bit you’re like… ok… I don’t think this is for me… wait… what? And then you’re hooked.

    Anathem is one of the worst that was like that. Snow Crash would be the polar opposite and one of the rare ones that just jumps straight into the world building.

    Unrelated: I just finished Wind and Truth. So weird to think somebody got me hooked on Sanderson about 2 years ago and I’ve burned through all his books (except for Reckoners and the Alcatraz books). The first because I haven’t tried one but seems a bit more youth oriented and the latter because it is more youth oriented than my usual tastes.





  • Different perspectives from not alien but not human (unless otherwise specified not hard sci-fi)

    • Klara and the Sun (story of an android coming to awareness of themselves, to their purpose as a friend for a child, to attachment and love as well as dealing with the inevitable changes and loss as the child grows up)

    • Several short stories by Ted Chiang
      Exhalation, The Lifecycle of Software Objects (technically hard sci-fi), The Great Silence

    Kind of human

    • Murderbot Diaries (Autonomous killing machine/human cyborg going rogue that is learning what it is to be human, and just wants to watch serials and be left alone)

    • Ancillary Justice (Ships with remote/linked instances in control of human bodies and what happens when one of those “remotes” is all that’s left of that consciousness. Navigating the line of human/machine/etc.). Not political per-se but resonates with various political perspectives on autonomy/society vs individualism/ etc.

    • Dogs of War. Bio weapons part animal human hybrids and wars, morality, doing what your meant to do and made to do vs becoming aware of your actions and what is right/wrong.


  • Yeah. Three body problem is a well done translation of a Chinese authors work and so I suspect there’s some things that just culturally come across easily. Nothing makes that more obvious than the sequels where it feels like it wasn’t as painstakingly done to try to convey such things like the first.

    I will say I really enjoyed the paper ménagerie by Ken Liu (the aforementioned translator) and it was a unique look from a different cultural perspective.

    Back on topic to sci-fi. Do you prefer singular protagonist in a limited scale of time (person/crew) fighting against some local challenge (Martian/Expanse) or larger sweeping epics spanning centuries and a lot of perspectives (Dune, Foundation)?

    More human/realistic perspectives (Martian) or are you open to Alien/Non-human perspectives (ex. protomolecule perception about the gates reopening)


  • I checked the good reads list of top rated hard science and saw a few items I can recommend.

    • Altered Carbon. A fun and intense read. Future hard science. If people’s consciousness could be transmitted/used for interstellar travel kind of thing then the scenarios listed here adhere to their own crazy rules.

    • Three Body Problem. First book is amazing. The sequels are good enough but the translations are a little rougher but the story carries through.

    • Enders Game. Tactical and hard science aspects to it. Gets more metaphysical later in the series.

    • Contact. Absolute gem that I re-read a few years back.

    • Ancillary Justice. More future/hard science but worth mentioning in any list I’m willing to put Altered Carbon in. It has a viewpoint and it’s use of alternate societal perspectives (from a society that is uniform in so many ways to organic “ship” drones to questions about what is a person/identity) all wrapped in a great sci-fi story

    • The moon is a harsh mistress. A little dated and the way women/people are referenced shows it (much like foundation) but a solid one that is a little more hard science and may be more in line with what you’re thinking of.

    Going over this list I realize how hard it is to find true hard science (Martian) that doesn’t lean into the more future tech but consistent physical laws (Expanse) to way future nano tech or consciousness transfer (Altered Carbon, etc)


  • Do you like protagonists that use their wits to beat a scenario or the hard science more?

    For example a fun read that’s, in my opinion, best experienced as an audiobook is the dungeon crawler carl. It’s definitely a good example of the first type. It’s not realistic. It’s literally real life made into a D&D game (LitRPG) it is just one scenario after another of Carl just finding ways to manipulate and play with the “rules” of the messed up game.

    If you’re more into the hard science than The Expanse as others have said. Or maybe even the Revelation Space series where it is future tech but relativistic time plays a part. Less of the “one person/group against all odds” but a good read nonetheless.










  • And to add to the conversation(if there’s anything incorrect please let me know) from videos I’ve seen by MentourPilot, Captain Joe and online sources

    The process will most likely look like the following (assuming an emergency descent is needed because the cabin can’t be pressurized like with the window vs some smaller hole air leak):

    • They will put on their own o2 masks (it’s critical to do this as you can lose consciousness in under a minute)

    • They will set the transponder to a code that denotes the emergency to both ATC and nearby traffic

    • They will radio the distress both for ATC but also nearby planes to give them a heads up that they’ll be rapidly descending. If it’s in a high traffic area they may wait for approval to begin descent (and you can be sure ATC is going to be moving planes out of the way.). If it’s taking too long they will begin descending anyway.

    • They’ll announce to the cabin that they’re doing an emergency descent

    • They will start a rapid descent to 10,000 ft (if terrain allows it, otherwise down to whatever they can safely get to). This is because the emergency o2 is limited to about 15 minutes.

    Some interesting things I learned about this.

    They will often use autopilot for the descent and level flight. This is because of limited visibility and a risk of possible issues caused by low o2.

    They turn on all lights to make sure they’re as visible as possible to other traffic.

    This descent will be really unpleasant. Not a gentle descent but the safest one (especially if they’re unsure if there’s any structural issues) they can do. Which will be quite a bit steeper than anybody is used to.

    So passengers on the plane will experience this as:

    • Loud rushing noise. Possible moisture filling the cabin now that you have outside cold air mixing with warm air and surfaces inside

    • Masks dropping and seatbelt signs

    • Shortly after the Captain saying “Emergency descent” 3 or so times

    • Flight screw scrambling to seats and putting on masks

    • The sound of the wings adjusting for speed brakes, shuddering from the flight profile change,

    • The sounds of the engines being revved up to the planes maximum speed as the nose of the plane tipping down. It will feel like it’s faster than it really is with the shift in gravity followed by being pressed back due to the increase in speed during descent.

    • The plane shifting as they turn away from the main traffic area as they descend (unless told otherwise by ATC, etc)

    Not a fun experience I’m sure

    Some sources to check out

    Emergency descend!! Cockpit video

    Explosive decompression at Simulador TCP. EAS Barcelona pilot school

    Pressurisation Problems: Guidance for Flight Crews

    Aircraft “Falling” - Emergency descend explained