His graph is still valid, as the exponential growth doesn’t really matter if we start from 0 BCE or 10000 BCE.
Even if we would loose 60% of the population now, we would still be 1.5 times the population of 1900 (9miljard x 0.4=3.6 >2)
Murmaider 🎶
the best thing that could have happened to Ukraine.
And therefore the world
“Mishandling migration” is a pessimist position. With this position you can be wrong all the time, and then when an event occurs that false in the pessimistic view “you” claim full victory. It is similar to the story of doctors and a terminal patient that keeps outliving the diagnosis (although doctors dont celebrate the moment thay are proven right).
For example why “populist concerns” are not to be taken too seriously are football hooligans. True (white) nationals tearing down city centres, yet you don’t hear anything about “bad integration” or “religion of peace”, or any conversation from that corner.
Lol you knob, go do something about your politics instead of “warning smug Europeans” on a obscure forum
I must say I’m quite intrigued that we know it has beer before knowing it has a carbon atmosphere
The root of the problem is the baby boom, not the restabilization of the populace
*despite suspect being far right
Thank you for the nostalgia
It takes zero effort to be explicit. It would also lessens the misinformation potential.
Nice way of being racist; brown people can’t attend a private school huh…
This article really requires a “white boy” before all the brits start burning hotels with refugees again
Not world news worthy article