• 0 Posts
  • 123 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 19th, 2023

help-circle



  • Supernatural’s whole story arc was based on this (and it worked for them). Inevitably, to beat this big bad that the brothers have absolutely no business going toe-to-toe with, they must do something that is bound to catch up with them, but it’s either that or the world is fucked. Then the next thing is even worse, and they have to do something that will bite them even worse in order to stop the world from getting fucked. And it just keeps ramping up, they keep losing more and more of themselves and punching so far above their weight class that they end up… well, no spoilers, in case somebody wants to watch (and I don’t know how to do spoiler tags).

    There’s a point when Sam has some injury, like a broken arm or gunshot wound or something, and he’s talking to a nurse or doctor who asks him to rate his pain from 0, which is no pain, to 10, which is the worst pain he could imagine. He gets a thousand-yard stare for a second and says “3.”



  • I appreciate the write-up, thank you! I feel like a lot of this is semantic differences. I’ve always thought of socialism as any public funds used specifically to help citizens (e.g. social security, medicare, unemployment, UBI, etc) and Communism to be the public owning and running the means of production, and distributing goods thereof, and the stateless, classless, moneyless society to be the ideal utopia it aspired to (similar to Star Trek). From your comment, I see that what I call Communism, you call Socialism (which explains a lot of confusion from discussions in the past with self-described Communists I’ve known), and the nameless Star Trek post-scarcity system you would call Communism.

    Do you think it is possible to slow-roll the transition peacefully, though? If, for example, instead of the government bailing out industries, they bought out industries on the cheap, slowly growing and monopolizing like Google or Amazon have? Or do you think the rich would simply block that from happening?


  • So I will admit that I am ignorant of a method of attaining Communism that isn’t at the end of a rifle, and thus authoritarian by nature (and fully accept that, to a degree, Capitalism is also at the end of a gun, but typically less overt, or often directed without instead of within). The only nations I’ve seen flying the red flag have appeared highly authoritarian (and I’m not going to get drawn into a “USSR and PRC aren’t/weren’t authoritarian, and DPRK is actually a utopia!” discussion, so if that’s the direction this is going, let me know and I’ll politely see my way out).

    I’ve seen in the lower comments that Socialism would be used as a gateway to Communism, but I am unclear about the transition from “everybody’s basic needs are met via taxation and distribution” to “personal property is abolished” (as I understand Communism to mean, please correct me if I’m wrong). Plenty of European countries have had (for the west), strong seemingly socialist systems, but they don’t seem to be deliberately angling toward Communism, for example.

    So I’m curious what this peaceful Capitalist to Communist timeline would look like.







    1. Don’t carry credit card debt. Save money if you can. Get a handle on basic finances

    Credit cards are this weird thing. If you need them, you shouldn’t use them (if you can help it). If you make plenty of money and don’t need them, they are a very useful financial tool. I have paid interest on one of my credit cards once in the past 3 years, and it was only to have extra available funds for buying a house. But I have accrued well over 100k airline miles and several hundred (far more than the interest I paid) in cash back. I use credit cards exclusively for everything but my mortgage, and have them set to automatically pay the statement balance prior to the due date. If you aren’t extremely confident you can do that, you should avoid credit cards.

    I definitely ran afoul of credit cards in my youth, so the banks have gotten their pound of flesh from me.


  • TheDoozer@lemmy.worldtoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.works100%
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Depending on the work, I disagree.

    I work on a hangar deck supervising aircraft maintenance. At each shift change, all toolboxes are inventoried and all tools are accounted for. If people regularly show up late, either the few who do show up on time are always responsible for doing the tool inventories (or any other shift change items) or the previous shift ends up having to stay later, which is just disrespectful to them and their time.

    Where my wife works, the clinic opens at 8 and the shift starts at 8 for all but the opener, so if her coworkers don’t show up at 8, she’s having to manage the patients by herself. On occasion for special circumstances, that’s understandable. But as a general “meh, 10 minutes late is just as good,” definitely not.

    Basically, if tasks are expected to be done specifically at the beginning of your shift, being late is unacceptable.





  • I cut my own hair every weekend. I’m in the military, though (and no, I don’t just shave it). I found that I do it more to my liking (and consistently) than the barbers I’ve gone to, it only takes 20 minutes, I don’t have to pay $30, and I can shower immediately after. I use a 6 (3/4 inch) on top, a 3 (3/8 inch) around the curve transitioning to the sides, and then fade down from there, 2 to 1.5 to 1 and finally .5 (1/16 inch) around my ears, side-burns, and most of the back. Keeps everything clean, I always look good, and I spend about $40 every year or two.


  • TheDoozer@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlMAGA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    My goodness, I only got as far as the first post.

    “Even though all evidence shows he was a radical leftist…”

    What? His parents said he was MAGA, like them. Some anonymous people and some talking heads that only benefit from him being leftist suggested he was leftist. I think I’ll believe his parents.

    And then talking about guns, and included the context of the quote (that gun deaths are a necessity of the second amendment) in which he likens it to driving, and the driving deaths each year from that. And particularly “the dems have no answer to that!” Except having a driver’s license isn’t just handed out to everyone, you have to prove you have the knowledge and training to operate a vehicle, it can be taken away, and there are various levels of licensing and what a person is allowed to drive. Those are, like, the majority of gun control measures we’re looking to apply.