

Why did they need to tear it apart to discover the advantage was government funding? It this just a click bait headline?


It is possible that any developer could just say “none” even if the extension does collect data? If it has to be manually disclosed, this won’t stop malicious actors. Only trustworthy extension developers would disclose this.
I think it WAS a problem in older models. Caused me to get rid of my 2004 Forester. That being said, I still managed to get around 180,000 miles on it before it was an issue.


I wish Xpenguins still worked. Who doesn’t want penguins walking all over the desktop?


Anything by Janes Combat Simulations.
I don’t know of any comprehensive source but there are a few basic things you that I do.
Yes, just because the source code is available doesn’t mean it is licensed for others to take. Now we have AI tools that have scraped the web for all of its content and won’t see the difference between source available, open source , and free and open source. It is possible that those who use AI tools could be unknowingly using code without the license to do so.


Don’t get upset about AI. It was just following orders.


Now that all he major AI companies have scraped all of the YouTube videos, Google wants to prevent others from getting into the market.


This argument in this article is poor. An analogy would be:
“Because donating free food to the poor might feed future criminals, we should no longer provide free food.”


f(x)=x? In theory the water in a shower can get infinitely cold? That would be some shower that can go past absolute zero. It would be interesting to shower in a Bose-Einstein condensate.
Perhaps you have vim-tiny installed by default on your distro rather than just vim?