Thank you!

Thank you!

Thank you!

Why not?! We’ve already decided corporations are people, and people are not people; this is just par for the fucking course.

Goddamnit.

Fuck Nintendo.

This?

I’m not implying anything. I’m outright saying that the US government is corrupt enough to take kickbacks by corporations for political favors. I’m also saying Zuck didn’t bribe Trump’s admin enough (i.e. donations to his inaugural fund) to get away with their bullshit.

Days? No. Try years, if ever. I’m still getting recommendations of kids songs from years ago when I let my kids use my account.

At least you’re not lactose intolerant; otherwise the milk would be giving you diarrhea instead. 🤢

This? I might have to go watch this episode.

Hell no! My ass going to Spotify to play it right meow.

The only crime he committed was not bribing the Trump administration enough to stay off the anti-trust radar. I hope they burn it all to the ground.

Thought Police.

Distribution, decentralization… those ideas only serve to add unnecessary complexity to a sensitive and critical infrastructure. Instead of tweeting the baby with the bathwater, let’s work toward making these institutions not rely on or be beholden to governments. Anything else is a poor man’s Band-Aid to the problem.

FWIW, I agree with your concerns, but not the proposed solutions. Regardless, these are the types of discussions we all should be having for our critical infrastructure.

Who did you piss off? 😳

Decentralizing a foundation such as CVE would do more harm than good. For things like git or the fediverse it makes perfect sense, but the last thing I want something like the CVE to be is fragmented. We need a single source of truth for this.

Now setting up a non-profit foundation and cutting dependence with governments is a good thing, but it’s not the same as decentralized.

As someone who has had a vasectomy, can confirm. What they do is to disable the sperm making, while leaving pee storage intact, by only cutting the spermtube.

Edit: speeling

You’re low key proving my point about how people think.

It’s not about them actually being the same.

What @lowleekun@ani.social is saying is that no one sees themselves as the bad guy, regardless of what their opponents think.