There’s also Beehaw’s new writing community which just opened, !writing@beehaw.org

Not specific to writing prompts, but there’s at least one prompt that’s been posted, and there’s discussion about creating a regular writing prompts thread as well.

FED-uh-verse

One exercise that I know people who’ve had success with is to be focusing on simpler scales, which will all have slightly different fingerings for both hands. Just the regular primarily white-key scales.

E.g. C major goes 12312345 for the right hand, and 54321321 for the left hand.

Then once that’s doable at some speed, moving onto the tricker simple scales. And then going into contrary motion (where the right hand goes up and the left hand down). I’ve found that helps people get more used to their hands working independently. Especially because it provides more structure, and just one thing (different fingering) to focus on, rather than adding in differences in tempo etc.

The last point - “We can’t have people eager to separate “human, the biological category, from a person or a unit worthy of moral respect.”” is one I understand where they’re coming from, but am very divided, perhaps because my academic background involves animal rights and ethics.

The question of analogising animals and humans is so tricky with a very long history - many people have a kneejerk reaction against any analogy of nonhuman animals and (especially marginalised) humans, often for good reasons. For instance, the strongest reason is the history of oppression involving comparisons of marginalised groups to animals, specifically meant to dehumanise and contribute to further oppression/genocide/etc.

But to my mind, I don’t find the analogies inherently wrong, although they’re often used very clumsily and without care. There’s often a difference in approach that entirely colours people’s responses to it; namely, whether they think it’s trying to drag humans down, or trying to bring nonhuman animals up to having moral status. And that last is imo a worthy endeavour, because I do think that we should to some extent separate “human, the biological category, from a person or a unit worthy of moral respect.” I have moral respect for my dog, which is why I don’t hurt her - it’s because of her own moral worth, not some indirect moral worth as suggested by Kant or various other philosophers.

I don’t think the debate is the same with AI, at least not yet, and I think it probably shouldn’t be, at least not yet. And I’m also somewhat sceptical of the motivations of people who make these analogies. But that doesn’t mean there’ll never be a place for it - and if a place for it arises it’s just going to need to be done with care, like animal rights needs to be done with care.

Yeah I totally agree with that! I think it’s a basic side effect of the way the voting algorithm works - namely that early votes count for a hell of a lot, and so memes/pictures get those early votes much earlier than discussion posts do - because it’s much quicker to look at a picture, than it is to read a long text post.

So the good thing about smaller (especially smaller and well-moderated) communities, is that there’s enough space for text posts to breathe, without competing with memes for vote ascension space. But that doesn’t erase the problem of meme/image supremacy in r/all and r/popular.

Sure, when it’s r/all by top. But a massive part of it is subreddits, which then constitute the front page. The majority of my Reddit front page isn’t memes, because my main subscriptions are things like acting, patientgamers, askhistorians, piano, etc. Which don’t have many, if any, memes posted.