Sure. But we need to see pics, or it didn’t happen.

The abstract doesn’t mention them re-gaining their old capacity. It only says they shrink. And something about voltage. So I have my doubts. I mean it’s nice if my spicy pillow shrinks a bit. But what does that help if it continues to stay nearly dead? And an application in products would be hard to accomplish. At that temperature, all the plastic etc is going to melt. Maybe the solder as well.

I think it needs to work across instances, since we’re concerned wit the Fediverse and federation is one of the defining mechanics. Also when I have a look at my subscriptions, they come from a variety of instances. So I don’t think a single instance feature would be of any use for me.

Sure. And with the cosine similarity, you’d obviously need to suppress already watched videos. Obviously I watched them and the algorithm knows, but I’d like it to recommend new videos to me.

Wasn’t “error-free” one of the undecidable problems in maths / computer science? But I like how they also pay attention to semantics and didn’t choose a clickbaity title. Maybe I should read the paper, see how they did it and whether it’s more than an AI agent at the same intelligence level guessing whether it’s correct. I mean surprisingly enough, the current AI models usually do a good job generating syntactically correct code one-shot. My issues with AI coding usually start to arise once it gets a bit more complex. Then it often feels like poking at things and copy-pasting various stuff from StackOverflow without really knowing why it doesn’t deal with the real-world data or fails entirely.

I’ve also had that. And I’m not even sure whether I want to hold it against them. For some reason it’s an industry-wide effort to muddy the waters and slap open source on their products. From the largest company who chose to have “Open” in their name but oppose transparency with every fibre of their body, to Meta, the curren pioneer(?) of “open sourcing” LLMs, to the smaller underdogs who pride themselves with publishing their models that way… They’ve all homed in on the term.

And lots of the journalists and bloggers also pick up on it. I personally think, terms should be well-defined. And open-source had a well-defined meaning. I get that it’s complicated with the transformative nature of AI, copyright… But I don’t think reproducibility is a question here at all. Of course we need that, that’s core to something being open. And I don’t even understand why the OSI claims it doesn’t exist… Didn’t we have datasets available until LLaMA1 along with an extensive scientific paper that made people able to reproduce the model? And LLMs aside, we sometimes have that with other kinds of machine learning…

(And by the way, this is an old article, from end of october last year.)

Oh, wow. Should be pretty obvious that something isn’t open source, …well… unless the source is open…

Sure, very likely the people writing a legal text were not referring to legal definitions of a term or the legal status of things. They must have meant biology instead. /s

Can I now claim what I did was morally not that bad, and the law is likely not bothered with the legal definition of crime? I mean they could have meant ethics and maybe it’s morally justified to role play as Robin Hood, or insult someone who had that coming? Or maybe it wasn’t me, biology made me do it and that’s now the deciding factor in court?

How is “no, no, they didn’t mean the legal definition” something a judge would say?

Oh well, all good until the US stop sending ammunition and the multi-million air defense system becomes a very expensive paperweight. She could ask the Ukrainians how that feels. But then she isn’t stupid, just malicious. And maybe a bit corrupt.

Happens once every year or two, that some idiots do this and we get a newspaper article about it.

And if we’re really talking about “open-source” and not just “open-weight”, the additional scientific papers, datasets and tooling are going to help democratize the technology and even out the playing field to a degree.

I feel this is going to fade, though. Today’s kids have digital clocks (and it’s been that way for quite some time now), they read (and repeat) exactly what’s written there, like 7:26. The whole “in five minutes, it’s half to eight” is mainly because of the clock hands on an old-school time-telling device. With those, you have a quick look and see the minute hand is almost at the bottom, in fact it’ll be there in 5 minutes. And that’s why you say it like that.

beehaw.org aspire to be nice, friendly diverse and safe. But they’re more towards nice, not women. And we have lemmy.blahaj.zone for queer folks. To my knowledge, there isn’t a place aimed towards women. Maybe heehaw is the closest… Still not really a fit.

You could go ahead and also ask in some of the women communities, see how they get along here on the Fediverse.

EDIT: See edit in my previous comment on how Bluetooth can do it. I believe that’d work with any device that can do bluetooth, including iPhones.

I suppose along an iPhone? I mean Apple does the whole ecosystem. And this isn’t really a technical limitation. Most phones have the audio stream connected to the processor. Theoretically they could forward it, or record it. But on Android, the often don’t seem to allow any of that, and Apple doesn’t allow third parties (like a Linux computer) to access “their” interfaces, so I don’t know if you can forward it to arbitrary computers either.

I mean there are solutions. Other people here outlined that. For example mimicking a bluetooth handset. You could solder a cable to attach to a computer’s AUX input. Or use a landline or different service to manage the calls whithin a PBX. But none of that is very easy to set up or proper forwarding. Maybe the best bet would be bluetooth.

I haven’t checked, but ffmpeg is super versatile. It does a lot of stuff, even esoteric and niche things… Sometimes depends on what flags are set when compiling it, so the Linux distros don’t always include everything ffmpeg is capable of.

I don’t think there is a way to forward cellular phone calls. You’d need a phone provider which provides that feature, like a Voice-over-IP provider. Or a SIM card in your computer. Plus the right phone contract.

Kdeconnect can forward a lot of other things though, like SMS, files…

I wish there was a way to hook into calls. But as far as I know they’re deliberately keeping that closed.

EDIT: Actually, I’ve just tried Bluetooth (since someone suggested that) and that does just about that. I’ve used the standard Bluetooth pairing within the GNOME desktop, and now my Android phone lists the computer in the audio options of a call (where you can choose if it’s phone, handsfree or via a bluetooth device… And I can click on my computer name there, and it’ll then use the computer’s mic and speakers.

8FE62A

Naja, so funktioniert Handel eigentlich immer. Solange man Nachfrage erwartet, Sachen einkaufen und teurer wieder weiterverkaufen. So wird man (erfolgeicher) Handelsmensch.

Würd aber abraten einfach die eigene Garage mit Ramsch vollzumachen. Erstens sind die Preise aktuell unverändert. Und Zweitens muss man da ein paar Sachen für lernen und beachten.

Yes. Plus the turing machine has an infinite memory tape to write and read. Something that is in scope of mathematics, but we don’t have any infinite tapes in reality. That’s why we call it a mathematical model and imaginary… and it’s a useful model. But not a real machine. Whereas an abacus can actually be built. But an Abacus or a real-world “Turing machine” with a finite tape doesn’t teach us a lot about the halting problem and the important theoretical concepts. It wouldn’t be such a useful model without those imaginary definitions.

(And I don’t really see how someone would confuse that. Knowing what models are, what we use them for, and what maths is, is kind of high-school level science education…)

It’s a long article. But I’m not sure about the claims. Will we get more efficient computers that work like a brain? I’d say that’s scifi. Will we get artificial general intelligence? Current LLMs don’t look like they’re able to fully achieve that. And how would AI continuously learn? That’s an entirely unsolved problem at the scale of LLMs. And if we ask if computer science is science… Why compare it to engineering? I found it’s much more aligned with maths at university level…

I’m not sure. I didn’t read the entire essay. It sounds to me like it isn’t really based on reality. But LLMs are certainly challenging our definition of intelligence.

Edit: And are the history lessons in the text correct? Why do they say a Turing machine is a imaginary concept (which is correct), then say ENIAC became the first one, but then maybe not? Did we invent the binary computation because of reliability issues with vacuum tubes? This is the first time I read that and I highly doubt it. The entire text just looks like a fever dream to me.

Yeah, seeking support is notoriously difficult. Everyone working in IT knows this. I feel with open-source, it’s more the projects which aren’t in a classic Free Software domain, who attract beggars. For example the atmosphere of a Github page of a Linux tool will have a completely different atmosphere than a fancy AI tool or addon to some consumer device or service. I see a lot of spam there and demanding tone. While with a lot of more niche projects, people are patient, ask good questions and in return the devs are nice. And people use the thumbsup emoji instead of pinging everyone with a comment…

I feel, though… I you’re part of an open source project which doesn’t welcome contributions and doesn’t want to discuss arbitrary user needs and wants, you should make that clear. I mean Free Software is kind of the default in some domains. If you don’t want that as a developer, just add a paragraph of text somewhere prominently, detailing how questions and requests are or aren’t welcome. I as a user can’t always tell if discussing my questions is a welcome thing and whether this software is supposed to cater for my needs. Unless the project tells me somehow. That also doesn’t help with the beggars… But it will help people like me not to waste everyone’s time.

There are no tags as of now. Everyone is running the main branch from Git. I suppose that’s going to change at some point when PieFed deems itself ready.