Thrift store? Believe it or not, 1%er activity.

Yarr.

Ouch, how did this happen, and why have patches sat unreviewed?

Excel is a hammer.

When holding a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

Stop using Excel for anything more than simple data extraction and pivot tables, get a custom solution tailored to your needs rather than a monstrous Excel document that consumes 14 GB of RAM to run.

Look into the Shavian alphabet

Yeah, with OP’s attitude - skill issue

I hate cilantro

Small projects do not benefit from economies of scale, I can almost guarantee you very little of this is actual profits.

I’m ok with k8s, I’m just chicken shit because I’ve never had an opportunity to use them in prod.

How does Talos differ from something like Ubuntu with microk8s?

Is it production-ready?

I’m thinking of setting it up on an OVH bare metal dedicated server to run various sites and Docker processes, but I don’t want to handle Kubernetes myself.

kek

You need to double up your newlines :)

Ew, AI generated image.

Made with ❤️ using stolen assets.

!shrinkflation@lemmy.ca

I believe it has to be declared on the packing manifest, but it relies on the expeditor being truthful. That’s my understanding of it.

I don’t think it’s about the place of manufacture, but rather the place of origin. A lot of items are manufactured all over the place.

Both can be true, Python does have a lot of examples floating online.

Any time an eligible item crosses the US / Canada border, a 25% tariff is applied. This is how the US does it, so this is what the Canadian government is copying.

This is terrible for auto manufacturing, where various parts cross the border multiple times between raw materials, loose parts, assembled parts and assembled vehicle. Every time those parts or materials cross either border, it gets tariffed 25%.

I believe if your item comes from the US, lands in another country, gets re-labeled and then enters Canada, it won’t be tariffed, but don’t quote me on that.

That’s because scripted languages are more forgiving in general.

You: “Public opinion is tanking, so it must be true!”

Them: Provides detailed, sourced information that explains the situation

You: “Nerd, I don’t read that shit”

Are you following your emotions or are you truly trying to understand the changes? You seem to be attacking / strawmanning people left and right in this thread and are generally not interacting in good faith.

Onus probandi.

You make the claims, you serve the proof. You can’t point at a vague, general direction and go “here, proof!”. Especially not a social media feed, that’s the most subjective, volatile “proof” you could provide.

Quote me the text, in its full context, where it says that Mozilla is selling the data they are “now collecting”, or that it was optional for them without degrading services. Because I can’t find it.

All I see is data that Mozilla is required to collect to provide existing services, they are now putting it in black on white. I don’t really care what the “general opinion” is, opinions do not automatically become facts once sufficient people hold them.

I’ve seen Mozilla do bad stuff, this is just a very standard privacy policy update. Let’s criticize them when they actually deserve it, and encourage them the rest of the time.

Also, nice strawman instead of simply answering my question. 🥰