Intersex is a biological rarity wherein a person exhibits sexual characteristics of both sexes. They’re neither strictly biologically male nor strictly female. Hence, if they’re supposed to use the bathroom matching their sex, they’ll need a separate bathroom.

(There’s a lot of complexity and unpleasantness I’m omitting for brevity, but the point is that they don’t fit into simple binary assumptions like the one underlying the headline)

You have a point. It was a joke to redirect the bull metaphor to a different animal, force of habit.

On the other hand, the term “pig” for Cops has become rather detached from the animal, just like Motherfucker doesn’t actually imply incestuous sexual relations.

But you have a point all the same.

Well, the German government has. It’s just that some people think “It won’t happen to me” until it does.

Also, it’s not bulls. It’s pigs, but the RPG kind of murder-pig with metal plating and steel-tipped tusks.

I’d use it as toilet paper, but it wouldn’t actually make my butt cleaner.

the country’s last factory able to make steel from scratch

Daft cunts. If you neither have any redundancy, nor the bloody sense to guard your single point of failure, you deserve the pain.

The people probably don’t though. That’s always the tragedy with these things.

That’s probably the point: “Nobody forces us to recognise them, so we don’t”

Eurydike I was a boss bitch. Not only was she unusually prominent in politics for a queen, she also engaged in foreign policy on her own, successfully negotiationg with a foreign general to have him protect her late husband’s throne against a pretender, apparently without any participation from her son-in-law, who served as regent at the time.

The youngest of her sons, Phillip II, would go on to reform the military and secure hegemony over Greece, laying the groundwork for the invasion of Persia that he never got to carry out. After his assassination, that invasion was instead performed by his son, Alexander III, later dubbed “The Great” for this feat.

It should be noted that, with Alexander being on campaign for basically all of his reign and generally not too interested in domestic rulership, his mother Olympias of Epirus was the de facto ruler of Macedonia. Behind the successful general are two powerful women that first protected his father’s throne, then took care of the actual ruling so that he would be free to hunt glory.

I’m not saying you’re wrong, but personally, I’ve run out of fucks to give about the whole debate. I have an opinion, sure, but I don’t want to throw it into the sewage pool that is the discussion in this comment section.

Yeah, I know, but this one seems more vicious to me somehow.

My mistake is that I keep thinking the best of people, but after having been a cynic misanthropist for long enough, I’d prefer the regular disappointment over permanent bitterness.

What the fuck is this comment section even? Is vape vs cig the new Star Trek vs Star Wars, where fans of either side congregate to tear into each other with enough vitriol to make both vape and cig look healthy in comparison?

Das war eher als Korrelation gemeint. Wer Amerika verlässt hat eine gewisse Vernunft, was meiner Meinung nach eher gegen Dummheit spricht. Trifft natürlich auch nicht auf alle zu.

Unfortunately, the German bureaucratic clusterfuck does tend to hamstring good intention with stupid regulations carried out to the pedantic letter. It’s a bit of a lottery at times whether you’ll find yourself dealing with a human or with a relentless rule fetishist, and the more complex a process is, the more people it involves and the greater the chance someone will obstruct.

I’d hope things have improved and I hope they’ll improve further. Shame that it’s too late for you.

Ich spreche nicht für alle, aber ein “dummer einsprachiger Amerikaner” der nach Europa abhaut verliert (meiner Meinung nach) zumindest das erste Attribut und mit dem zweiten kann ich ganz gut leben.

I don’t speak for everyone, but a “dumb monolingual American” that to Europe runs off loses (in my opinion) at least the first attribute and with the second I can quite well live.

The awkward word order of the translation is intentional to more closely mirror the German word order. I promise you, I can also good English speak ;-)

The detailed and nuanced answer would take into account the exact crime, but the short answer: No.

A democracy must guard itself against usurpation by demagogues that rally people through deceitful rhetorics and appeals to passion with the intent to break the order of that democracy. That order, among other things, contains laws restraining what politicians are and aren’t allowed to do. A candidate with clear disregard for these laws is a threat to that order, such that this democracy must protect itself by not allowing them to hold powers they are likely to use irresponsibly.

Put differently, someone who shows clear contempt for democratic rules is no longer entitled to democratic rights either. Note the distinction: democratic rights doesn’t mean human rights.

India? You mean the “+05:30” timezone? I’d rather not deal with that :30 tbh. I like having my timezone arithmetics quite simple, just adding and subtracting hours. A half hour offset is worse to me than having to switch which offsets to use when. (Still better than Australia Central Western with its +08:45, but that’s a low bar to clear.)

yes, of course, you don’t want to cause an international incident by pointing fingers until you’re really sure. They need to publish the fact that it’s even considered a possibility for political purposes, but they can’t assert with confidence for diplomatic ones.

You might get sued, but you might also go viral

Probably along the lines of “I approve of what he’s doing, and I find the way he’s doing it very smart.”

I want Russian civilians to suffer a bit because they need to fucking get the hint and do something it they want to survive

Morale Bombing has never, ever, ever worked. It has been tried: Nazi Germany bombed the UK, the UK and US bombed Germany, the US leaned on it during the cold war in Korea and Vietnam, Russia did it to Ukraine. By and large the results have been the same: Civilians hate being bombed. They’ll hate you for bombing them. They’ll rally against you.

Bombing can influence the leadership decisions, if it damages target of value to the high and powerful, but the historical record on bombing civilians to make them oppose the war isn’t just bad, is terribly one-sided. And it makes sense: If Russia were to bomb your hometown, would that make you want to surrender or fight back?

(And in case anyone thinks that Japan was defeated just by the nukes, nothing is ever that simple in war and Japan was on the back foot already. What the nukes achieved was that the political leadership, already distressed by the way the war was going, saw the sheer and unprecedented destructive power and opted to surrender. The civilians’ will had little to do with it.)