• 1 Post
  • 101 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 23rd, 2023

help-circle










  • Having Krita as basic image editing is doable. However, if you actually use them professionally, you’ll realize that Krita is definitely not alternative to those.

    Krita is a first-class painting software, and even its current development is more closer to be Clip Studio Paint alternative, like having comic layer, webtoon layout, etc. The dev regularly observate Clip Studio Paint development.

    Affinity Photo is actually easier to use than any alternative, including Photoshop and even GIMP. Its base system also much more faster than Photoshop, GIMP, and even Krita.


  • I conclude that as I’ve been helping people setting their computer as well as teaching people to use various softwares for 15 years :)

    I always try to know what things they want to do and their skill level, then recommending software that might be suitable for them. It can be proprietary, but most of the time I tried to recommend FOSS alternative instead.



  • I’m talking flexible UI as relative to Clip Studio Paint.

    The software is now an industry standard for manga, webtoon, 2D animation, and general ACG-related illustration in Asia. It was so good that there’s no other alternative that have it. Not even Photoshop or Krita.

    I read that Krita dev also agree that it will be nice to have it.

    There’s a ton of unique workflow only be possible with it.




  • I believe when majority of people saying “Photoshop has this, we should do this as well” are not actually saying GIMP should create a total carbon-copy.

    People loves easy to use interface, not carbon copy of Photoshop, even if they don’t say that. They just don’t know how to articulate their frustration better.

    When Affinity Photo emerges as actual Photoshop alternative, no one complains regarding “not being Photoshop clone” because the interface is actually easier than Photoshop, while still being advanced software.

    New GIMP user complaining about interface “not being Photoshop clone” is indicator that GIMP interface is not easy to use and intuitive enough.


  • No. Importance of UX simply means advance users can customize their workflow while making it easy to use for casual users.

    Kinda like Krita or Blender. Both are not perfect, but the dev are working on it, together with the community.

    Even GIMP dev also working on that, they have GIMP UX issue tracker here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/GIMP/Design/gimp-ux/

    “your program should look and behave exactly like this other program made by a corpo, because I’ve learned that one already”

    Oftentimes established workflow is already simple. There’s no need to reinvent this from scratch. Example: Npainter and AzPainter are heavily inspired by PaintToolSAI. Inochi Creator is a clone (with unique feature) of Live2D Cubism.