FAR manager (clone of Norton Commander) might be worth giving a look. Not a GUI, though, it’s TUI but responds to mouse.

On Debian, sudo apt install far2l and then run far2l.

BTW, to add ssh-agent authenticated scp connection, press F11, go to NetRocks and create connection. in the dialog you’ll need to select the protocol to scp and then auth method in “protocol options”. you can edit an existing connection by going back to the connection “directory” and using F4 on the connection. Once you connect you can copy/move files back and forth.

Along with scp it supports eg. smb, nfs and davs.

Your question, “What features does the Windows version of Calibre have that the Linux version not have?” cannot be answered without accepting an unargued premise: that the windows version has more features than the Linux version.

Nope, it simply asks (or even expresses genuine curiosity) about a subset of features on windows which might be missing in Linux version. That’s if you want to be super logical and fussy about things. If not, you could have just answered or moved the discussion in any relevant direction you would like. That was always allowed.

Ironically, you kinda did answer it, at least in part, by mentioning the AI slop bloat. Why hide your answer behind a wall of being a jerk, though? I can only speculate. Too little sleep, too many old Rationality Rules videos? :-) Thatt’s none of my business; I just hope you feel better now.

point taken. I see how it can be a good balance of pros/cons.

re: debianland, i’m not sure i understand the question so…

Certain major version of a “traditional distro”, say debian 13 provides fixed list of libraries and apps (which get updated during the lifetime but only to necessary extent). each of those can only depend on a particular version selected by debian. eg. if for libfoo, the provided version is libfoo-1.2, then anyone who depends on libfoo must depend on libfoo-1.2. (if that can’t be achieved before release then that package is simply removed.)

note that two versions of the same package can’t co-exist on the same system. (this is basically true for debianland and fedoraland; because packages share the same filesystem it would be not feasible to make it work without huge amount of added complexity and bug surface. definitely not on a distro-wide level).

honestly i’ve never used backports; I don’t know what process they use to select versions; i would assume that it’s basically on a best effort basis.

personally if i don’t find the stable version new enough, I look for vendor repo, appimage or flatpak (roughly in that order)

I’ve found it helpful to install as much as possible as flatpak, since that decouples app updates from system updates

But doesn’t it eat all disk space? And don’t flatpak apps tend to proliferate dependencies on outdated stuff? From my experience (and that’s just maybe dozen of apps that simply don’t exist in the distro) when running flatpak update i always get deprecation warnings about some platform flatpaks that some of the apps depend on. And given that everything is few hundreds of megs, sigh…

That’s why I like distros like Debian: there’s always strong pressure for apps to converge towards newer versions of libs/frameworks. Sure, it takes work to maintain but IMHO it’s worth it: once the app is in, you know it’s playing nice at least to that extent. AFAIK one of Flatpak’s core features is to lower the barrier by allowing multiple dependencies co-existing and thus removing that pressure, but that’s when the mess is inevitable.

Sorry for the rant.

It’s called “khlute”. (From now on–I made it up.)

That sounds really evil, esp. if you already have low expectations and it’s not like I’m going to defend ol’Bill, but…

Do we know what he used the patents for?

Acquiring patent sounds like you want to use it as a gold mine by manufacturing the product for “best” price, which is pretty heinous, especially when it’s in conflict with saving lives. But in principle it could be the opposite. One could, entirely for altruistic reasons acquire a patent from someone with the intent to make the cure more affordable.

I mean, I don’t like Bill but let’s be honest, he’s no RFK Jr.

Damn the clickbaitines of those video titles could make an old cowboy cry.

…but “don’t judge the book by the cover”, they say…

Use as $meta in my .i3/config, so … lots of things.

OT, but I feel like I keep seeing more of these “foo 1.2.3 released” announcements here on this channel.

Is it on topic, though? Shouldn’t the channel be more about Linux specific topics, rather than place for people to discuss updates of arbitrary selection of apps which just share the fact that they also run on Linux?

Edit: Technically the “I feel like” part was true but looking at the topic post … factually I’m totally wrong; it’s like 1 in 20 at most.

Man I’m 45 and I don’t blame the youth for any problems now. But maybe I’m just charging my blame lasers so that I can go even harder when I’m 65. Like, “when I was younger I never blamed the youths for problems but NOW, with YOU it’s justified!”.

Cats and dogs have more in common than you think.

For example, did you know that both cats and dogs have four legs? Yeah… There’s even more similarities, I hear…

Not acting “for free” does not mean zero-sum game.

I am no expert but I don’t think nations need to (or do, in general) operate on a zero-sum game. Actions can benefit both sides.

I call it a (wo…)manmade organised dogmatic religion. Sure, it might be just with a member of one (which is kinda cool and all and probably makes the organizing part a little bit easier) but it’s still kind of the same thing…

But seriously, it really depends on the details on such belief. It might be anything from harmless cope to superstition to delusion to paranoia. Or a first brave step in escaping a cult–which I would genuinely applaud.

It loosely reminds everyone of everything because “other planes of existence” is an all-encompassing meaningless term.

Just about every religion or fiction fits this, because they can–and do-- say “oh but it’s in oThEr pLaNeS oF eXiStEnCe!”. Which is a silly excuse because just about only concrete property that “other plane of existence” implies is that things on beings on it can’t affect things or beings on this plane of existence, so any theory (as in “has to make useful, verifiable predictions”) involving interactions between planes of existence is kind of dead on arrival.

Someone has to teach those little gangstas how extortion is done.

Well at least you tried…

I see, So that’s what the jack-o-lanterns are for?

So they are actually not lanterns but temporary toilets, but then someone got an idea to put candles in them so that it at least makes the “trick” part kind of uncomfortable. Right?

I usually dry inside and I make sure to turn stuff inside out before hanging it on the rack but I do it because I believe it dries better when things like pockets can be stretched out.

UV is a great point, I never realized that.

So it looks like I’ve been doing it all wrong all the time. Especially with hoodies, there’s always a t-shirt under them, so the “dirtier” side of the hoodie is more likely to be the outside.

With jeans it’s kind of the same, assuming not too much sweating (and proper underwear turnaround).

Just about the only thing I remember was that my mom always said that one should zip them up and not leave the zipper open – specifically so that it does not clank around and perhaps scratch the washing machine drum or get its tiny teeth brush and the moving part tangled with other, softer garments.

Turning the hoodie inside out might mitigate that a little bit more, but not much…

…or any inanimate objects, really.